Bobby (the bully) in GOP China Shop@elcidharth.com « elcidharth

elcidharth.com/…/bobby-the-bully-in-gop-china-shopelcidhart…

20 mins ago – Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal will deliver a forceful denunciation of his party’s Washington-centric focus in a speech to the Republican National

Bobby Jindal speaking truth to GOP power

Posted by Chris Cillizza and Aaron Blake on January 24, 2013 at 6:30 am

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal will deliver a forceful denunciation of his party’s Washington-centric focus in a speech to the Republican National Committee on Thursday evening, arguing that the GOP is fighting the wrong fight as it seeks to rebuild from losses at the ballot box last November.

“A debate about which party can better manage the federal government is a very small and short-sighted debate,” Jindal will tell the RNC members gathered in Charlotte, N.C. for the organization’s winter meeting, according to a copy of the speech provided to The Fix. “If our vision is not bigger than that, we do not deserve to win.”

Jindal’s speech — and his call to “recalibrate the compass of conservatism” — is the latest shred of a growing amount of evidence that the Louisiana governor is positioning himself to not only run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016 but do so in direct (or close to it) opposition to his party in the nation’s capital.

In the speech, Jindal will repeatedly caution that Republicans in Washington have fallen into the “sideshow trap” of debating with Democrats over the proper size of the federal government.

“By obsessing with zeroes on the budget spreadsheet, we send a not-so-subtle signal that the focus of our country is on the phony economy of Washington, instead of the real economy out here in Charlotte, and Shreveport (La.), and Cheyenne (Wyo.),” Jindal is set to say at one point in the speech. At another, he will argue that “Washington has spent a generation trying to bribe our citizens and extort our states,” adding: “As Republicans, it’s time to quit arguing around the edges of that corrupt system.”

Running against Washington — and the Republicans who inhabit it — is smart politics for Jindal. Congress, viewed broadly, is at or close to all-time lows when it comes to approval ratings. In a Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted earlier this month, just 24 percent of those tested approved of the job that Republicans in Congress were doing.

Even more stunning, among self-identified Republicans only 39 percent offered a favorable rating for their own party’s representatives, while 58 percent viewed their own elected officials in an unfavorable light.

Jindal is far from the only 2016 Republican hopeful to use his party’s Washington contingent as a foil to bolster his own political prospects. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s (R) rant against House GOPers for failing to bring up a funding bill on Hurricane Sandy – an instant classic — was another prime example of congressional GOPers being triangulated by their party’s future leaders.

(Also worth noting: Jindal isn’t completely free of Washington’s stench, having served three years in Congress before his 2007 election as governor.)

While Jindal’s attack on his party’s failed focus is the main thrust of the speech, he also took time to excoriate his party for some of the shortcomings made clear during the 2012 election.

* On Mitt Romney’s “47 percent” comments: “We must compete for every single vote — the 47 percent and the 53 percent, and any other combination that adds up to 100 percent.”

* On the party’s struggles to court non-white voters: “We must reject the notion that demography is destiny, the pathetic and simplistic notion that skin pigmentation dictates voter behavior. …The first step in getting voters to like you is to demonstrate that you like them.”

* On the likes of Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock: “It’s time for a new Republican party that talks like adults. We had a number of Republicans damage the brand this year with offensive and bizarre comments. We’ve had enough of that.”

And Jindal will also try to demonstrate the sort of big-picture vision — you know, “that vision thing” — that is in demand in a party searching for itself in the electoral wilderness. “We must shift the eye line and the ambition of our conservative movement away from managing government and toward the mission of growth,” Jindal will say.

With this speech, Jindal makes a strong case to be the leading voice — or at least one voice in a relatively small chorus — committed to leading the Republican party out of its electoral wilderness.

Fixbits:

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who went after Hillary Clinton hard on Wednesday, says she got emotional in order to deflect his questions.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) introduces a scaled-back gun control bill, which would attempt to crack down on straw purchases — i.e. people buying guns for other people, including criminals.

Vice President Biden will be in Richmond, Va., on Friday rallying for the Obama Administration’s gun control plan.

Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.) confirms he’s considering a primary challenge to Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.).

Another New Jersey poll shows Newark Mayor Cory Booker (D) leading Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) in a primary.

Sens. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) want a permanent earmark ban.

We finally know what Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said last week.

Former congressman Mike McMahon (D) may seek a rematch with embattled Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.) in their Staten Island-based district.

Must-reads:

Gun control proposals could split President Obama, Harry Reid” — Paul Kane, Washington Post

2014 Could Bring a Political Novelty: A More Limited House Playing Field” — Joshua Miller, Roll Call

SiDevilIam
Bobby (the bully) in GOP China Shop@elcidharth.com

· Reply · Share · Flag

Stella Guluchi
Not impressed one bit!! Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio, etc are all jockeying for position in the 2016 GOP Presidential nomination and trying to say things (but not back it up with action) they think the nation wants to hear. Jindal cannot in good conscience appear to talk all this tough talk against the GOP, the Party of No and consistently disrespect President Obama, will not implement Obamacare for citizens of his state, etc. The question is, if Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, God forbid, become President of the USA will they expect the opposition to treat them with the same obstructionism and disdain that they have shown President Obama. Quite frankly, unless the GOP truly looks inward and moves with the times they will be shut out of the WH for a very, very long time.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

ben16
Before you run for President, why not fix your own State? Louisiana pretty much falls at the bottom of the pile in just about any category. Oh, and the GOP only prefers old white men, or the sexy librarian look.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Annienel
11:28 AM EST
You mean Sarah Palin? Of course the old white men would want a person of that calibre that they can control.

· Flag

agoldhammer
Ask Governor Jindal why he took $10.6B to rebuild the New Orleans flood control system after Katrina. Should not the state have funded this? Ooops, I forgot, they don’t like to pay taxes for services. He’s a hypocrite and always has been!
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

ethan
11:33 AM EST
It’s called civil defense, goof ball. And if you had a clue about the revenue that flowed into and of the port of NO, you would soon realize the the money put into place by the feds would be returned through taxation. Are you only in favor of spending federal dollars that garner votes in return?

· Flag

ScipioAmericanus
This man will come over to the light once he realizes that the GOP doesn’t like colored folk gettin all uppity. they ll never say it in public, they ll denounce that here and in public, but when they go to the voting booth, the candidate better be:•old
•white
•angry
•against everything that is outside their bias bubbleOR
•ditzy bimbos with a penchant for colloquialisms
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Annienel
11:23 AM EST
He will learn in due course.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

katiedid19621
Jindal can’t win the Republican nomination. There is no way he can pass the litmus test of the conservative base. He is not nearly hateful, divisive, or mean-spirited enough to offend every independent/liberal in this country with an anti-Muslim, anti-personal-liberty, anti-woman, anti-Hispanic/Latino, anti-poor rhetoric that is like mother’s milk to the conservative base.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Annienel
11:25 AM EST
He can’t win and won’t win primarily because he is the wrong complexion. Can you imagine the Repubs. having 2 men of color in the WH one behind the other?
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

nick212
The jockying for position is starting early with the Republicans. Smart move to jump in just as Ron Johnson ( the handsome darling of he gun lobby and presidential hopeful) gets it handed to him by Hilary Clinton yesterday in the Benghazi hearings.Bu he has a long road to hoe. Quite apart from the tepid standing currently of Republican leaders, it is likely that public opinion may favor a female contender before another male ethnic group.Additionally, as intelligent a man as he seems to be – I do not think he has shown the vision to lead his party up and out of the deep hole they are in. Recognizing it is not enough – he must show he can reorientate the leadership – and stand above and on top of it.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Donald Fields
11:16 AM EST
I think Jindal’s asking the Republicans to like brown-skinned people is going to be a tough sell. What, after all, is the modern Republican party founded on but racial prejudice. Nixon began it with the “Southern Strategy”, Reagan continued it with his exploitation of the busing issue and his demonization of “welfare queens (aka Black Women), Bush used Willie Horton to great effect, and so on. Jindal is, he doesn’t seem to realize, a house N*****r.
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

Peter110
11:17 AM EST
Bobby Jindal’s participation in an exorcism squarely installs him as the Republican Clown Train conductor.He will never survive beyond Louisiana !!!
Liked by 6 readers

· Flag

dubious2
Jindal… be cool man, we R’s are ok, we just have to re-strategize and update our tactics.

· Reply · Share · Flag

Donald Fields
11:11 AM EST
Yes, but please don’t really change. I was nice knowing you.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

seablu
Awwww, the little man is mad, stomping his feet, and trying to make sure the Creationists and Tea Baggers don’t leave his fold.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

CantBelieveUSaidThat
Jindal is working to replace science with creationism in Louisiana, so he may be able to dumb down his constituents, but most of the rest of us are not that stupid.If repubs nominate creationist Jindal for 2016, they will soon be forced to disband due to sheer incompetence and incompatibility with reality.
Liked by 9 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Jolt2
Another clown running as a Washington outsider so he can be a Washington insider.
Too bad he is just recycling the same BS we heard in run up to the 2012 election.
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

PepperDr
Whatever, Apu.
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

lonquest
[Jindal] will argue that “Washington has spent a generation trying to bribe our citizens and extort our states,” which should be entertaining.The practice of “bribing citizens” presumably refers to Social Security and Medicare, and indicate that he would abolish both programs, and the “extorting states” piece refers to GW Bush’s policy of cutting back the aid to state budgets instituted by Richard Nixon.Looks like Republicans have a lot of disputes with their own historical policy positions. Who knew?
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

the_gardener
I live in Louisiana and voted for Governor Jindal in 2003, when he lost, and in 2007, when he won. Indeed, I was one of those idiots whom you saw on television celebrating wildly when he won in October, 2007. Governor Jindal’s administration has been a misfortune for Louisiana, not because he is incapable but rather because he has no interest in anything other than in securing the Republican nomination for the presidency. I have never before seen such a case of Potomac Fever.In order to burnish his credentials for future certification Governor Jindal has pursued fiscal policies that have gutted the funding for the state’s universities, funding that was never more than modest at best. He has crippled the state’s system of charity hospitals, and he did so with impunity because those most in need of those services are also those least likely to vote. Governor Jindal won the election in 2007 in large measure because he promised the electorate a clean, transparent government. He did, in fact, push several measures to that end through the legislature but exempted from these measures all deliberative processes of the executive branch of government. As to the definition of “deliberative processes”, well, as it turns out the phrase “deliberative process” is defined in any manner the governor sees fit, but it seems to include any word ever uttered by the governor in any context. He now proposes to eliminate the income tax in Louisiana and to recoup the lost revenue by increasing the sales tax.I cannot imagine why the candidacy of Governor Jindal should be taken seriously by any person with a detectable pulse. The Republican Party is filled with potential candidates who are more qualified than Governor Jindal. My own preference would be former Governor Mitch Daniels, but there are many other able men and women who merit serious consideration.
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

edismae
10:54 AM EST
“He now proposes to eliminate the income tax in Louisiana and to recoup the lost revenue by increasing the sales tax. “This must be the latest ALEC scheme, which Chris and Aaron are woefully ignorant of. It’s being pushed in LOTS of red states. They want to tax the poor to death, literally, with sales tax, the most regressive of taxes.Sorry, Mitch Daniels was George W. Bush’s Budget Director. That should permanently disqualify him from acceptability as a presidential candidate.
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

nick212
11:14 AM EST
edismae:He sounds like a flat (or consumption) tax nut. This is another losing goal of a serious political party – mathematically it can only put a greater burden of the middle income tax payer – which ultimately will lose votes.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

alarico
Kenneth the Page will never be POTUS.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

edismae
WHY does the national politics media pay attention to what this man SAYS when they can look at what he has DONE in Louisiana?
And, much of what he has done is as fundamentalist freaky as anything that ever came out of Todd Akin’s mouth.
I would also be willing to bet if a little research were done, Jindal has had similar things to say.
After all, THAT’S the party he was trying to impress until the first week of November.
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

OldBlindDog
I applaud Piyush for at least raising the point that the republican party must drastically change in order to survive.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

magnifco1000
Jindal going all Christie on them. But, too bad Bobby. You just don’t fit in with the Tea, you understand?
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Donald Fields
10:33 AM EST
Too dark
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

magnifco1000
10:39 AM EST
Yes, but the Tea doesn’t say it that way. More like, “hey Bobby, what’s your favorite food? You like watermelon?”
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

Harry Truman
10:44 AM EST
Liberal bigoted projection much!? Do you all forget that some of the tea party favorites were Allen West and Herman Cain?
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

rbaughman1
10:57 AM EST
What happened to them, anyway?
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

papafritz571
11:01 AM EST
Saw West on Faux News Reality Show, where all degenerates go when they lose their jobs.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

VegasJim
11:10 AM EST
Jindal left his teabag in the water WAY too long.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Basil Crofter
Right now, somewhere in a secret mountain compound, the GOP is slowly growing their 2016 Presidential candidate in a large glass-walled vat. The creature, floating in a red, murky liquid, and by all appearances a male human, will be programmed to spout populist-sounding, yet middle-of-the-road platitudes. He will be well-educated–though not so much as to put off the party base. Instead, he will claim he learned much more “from the school of hard knocks,” and from his wise old grandfather. He will be given a background in “business,” a surprisingly successful venture that he built from nothing. He will have an ethnic background that includes a story about nearly-penniless immigrants, but they will have arrived in the 19th Century from a western European nation. He will profess faith in an acceptable form of Christianity, but not seem overly-driven by religious concerns. He will have a wife (a still-pretty woman whom he met in his high school homeroom), and two smiling children, one boy, and one girl. He will wear a suit and tie when he has to, but will tell his audiences that he sure does prefer to wear “comfortable clothes” on the campaign trail, an outfit that to many will vaguely suggest the costume of a cowboy.And so the apparent political missteps and tone-deafness of the party’s last few years will have all been an extremely clever ruse. Though it will seem that an era of foolish GOP grandstanding has just passed, it is all an integral part of “Plan 16.” There is a reason the GOP has driven down any expectations of intelligence or competence.Suddenly… a seemingly coherent, non-petty, and reasonable candidate will appear on the scene. And by comparison to the years just passed, he will seem a great gulp of fresh air, a Republican with real ideas about real things. He’ll even have clearly-presented and thought-provoking plans rather than complaints and criticisms but no alternate proposal.Get ready.
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

OldBlindDog
10:36 AM EST
And the electorate will be so desperate for a candidate that isn’t crazy or a spendthrift, that they will give him a serious look.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Gwills24
10:44 AM EST
this seems accurate, i am guessing you have seen some of robert costa’s commentary on the recent gop retreat and some of the thought that came out of it. he concluded, for the most part, that gop leaders and prominent congressmen believed that they lost due to more a “branding” issue rather than a “policy” issue.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

archeopteryx
10:49 AM EST
This does not take into account the Republican primary sausage grinder.Doesn’t matter what you put into a sausage grinder – what comes out is always suspect..
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

ThePartiesAreTheProblem
10:50 AM EST
Chris Christie in Cowboy boots – now there’s a winner!
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

papafritz571
11:05 AM EST
And today, Paul Ryan claims he and Robme lost their race because they didn’t communicate well enough and their message didn’t get through. This is the real reason behind their demise. They have no idea what is truly going on in their country. Those political blindfolders they wear keeps them from seeing what the rest of us look like.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

lalarry
Christie yes…. Jindal no.
Jindal has shifted services and effectively begun reducing low income community hospital services. One of the first medical treatment programs reduced was for mental health and drug treatment.
He opted out of the health insurance exchange… so now louisiana will fall under the federal program and coverage..hmmmm.
His administration attempted to exempt newly created charter schools from the Louisiana state teachers retirement system… was ruled unconstitutional..
His administration pushed through the Louisiana the Science Education Act, whereby schools can use supplemental materials to textbooks in science courses teaching evolution and global warming.
Least anyone forget he supported Rick Perry… assume that was V.P. asperations.
Haven’t noticed much difference between his style of speaking and that of a desperate car salesman type.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Flying Tigers
Republicans Shape Shifter…His words SOUND Good !But the Underlying INTENT of Him and the GOP is very EVIL !
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

singe1
hopefully this clown will be the next republican candidate for president.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

No chance to be President .. none, zero.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

BalTMore
Another rat looks longingly over the side of the ship…
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

This is the guy who gave up his Indian name and religion of birth just so he could fit in better with his peers.
Nothing is sacred to him and he has no principles or pride in his past… he does what ever will get him up the ladder.
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

jhickey25811
The fake economy of Washington DC? I love these guys, I forgot real Americans don’t live in DC. No real people live here. Jindal, why do you have your sights set on the White House if everything in DC is so irrelevant to the rest of the country?
Liked by 9 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

ZeldaSagittarius
JINDAL and CHRISTIE will come to be known as “THE ANTI-REPUBLICANS.”
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

njglea
Republicans can try to change the message all they want. Their party has terminal cancer, thanks to Dictator Grover Norquist, Koch Brothers, nra and Wall Street. Send them all home in the next elections.
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

edismae
10:42 AM EST
You left out the leaders Murdoch/Fox News and Clear Channel/Limbaugh/Beck.

· Flag

nyskinsdiehard
We know what Jindal’s against; he will need to tell us what he’s FOR if he wants to be taken seriously. As others have commented, he seems to be more concerned with presentation than policies.As for his anti-Washington bias, I wonder how he’ll feel about Washington during the next hurricane season.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

papafritz571
10:48 AM EST
It is time someone of note start calling the Republicons ungrateful jerks for disparaging the nation’s government, the government that they all run to when they need something. Since when did our government become their whipping boy for their failures as legislature. They’ve been so damn contemptful of our government and the many agencies that work so hard to make this country a most wonderful and livable place on this earth. Only in the last four years have they actually added their nation’s government to their list of Americans they hate. If the Republicons in Congress and their owners hate the government so much, why do they spend hundreds of millions of dollars to work for it? Why do they choose to live in D.C. if it makes them so sick? Why are they so willing to become legislators and want to collect their fine salaries and benefits? The Republicons are dying because they refuse to move ahead. They want to take us back to before Civil Rights when they could get away with calling our black brethren unequal to the white man. They live in fear of losing their white privilege and so they have created this phony war against the very government that provides them with the life they now have. If Jindal had an ounce of moral courage he’d tell the truth and he’d get the hell out of Republicon Dodge City. Why would any intelligent person want to give more power to men and women in the Republicon Congress who have exhibited so much ignorance and arrogance
of history, especially American history, civics, science. definitely mathematics and even the English language. Mr. Jindal we are all appalled at your party. You are a fool for staying with them.

· Flag

info4
Jindal saying, “We had a number of Republicans damage the brand this year with offensive and bizarre comments. We’ve had enough of that.”
That is too simplistic, it is more than the comments it is the policy behind the comments. As long as Republicans want to force a women who has been raped to have that child, they will be on the wrong side of the majority of public opinion no matter how they try and word it.
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

edismae
10:44 AM EST
Bobby may be so truly superficial that he just doesn’t get it.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Wouldn’t his speech about the perils of focusing on the federal government have more credibility if he started out by saying that he is so against the focus on the federal government that he is never going to run for it?
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

wise_pharaoh
Jindal’s speech — and his call to “recalibrate the compass of conservatism” — is the latest shred of a growing amount of evidence that the Louisiana governor is positioning himself to not only run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2016 but do so in direct (or close to it) opposition to his party in the nation’s capital.Dream on Piyush, dream on!!!!!!!
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

Hoya4692
Jindal, Haley, Rubio? Hey GOP, it’s the message, not the messengers. To the extent a Jindal (or Rubio for that matter) attempts to change the GOP message, he stands no chance in the GOP at national electoral politics.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Betsy7
Reading these comments, it occurred to me that, if you combine Chis Christie and Boby Jindal, you would get one normal appearing person. Both are pretty smart and have been adept politicians. Not just pretty faces.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

info4
10:12 AM EST
If you combined them you would have a moderate.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Hoya4692
10:28 AM EST
If you combined them you’d have about 550 pounds . . .
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

lalarry
10:34 AM EST
Christie appears to be more the moderate… Jindal doesn’t come close.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

ImNotaWitch
Jindal 2016!

· Reply · Share · Flag

DavidH3
10:03 AM EST
Re-elect him as Gov of Louisiana!
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

SaraFlailin
More rhetorical BS from the GOP. It’s the policies, stupid.Bobby Jindal has the same chance of becoming President as I do: zero.
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

MinnyMa
There will be three hurricane seasons before the next Presidential elections. After the response from the GOP to Hurricane Sandy, Gov. Jindal may find himself in a precarious position.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

jeffwacker
Just s friendly reminder that Jindal supports teaching creationism in schools and executing sex offenders. Oddly, he’s much better at the aspects of his job involving petty government management than he is at the aspects involving judgment or vision, and he has allowed himself to get weighed down by pointless social controversies.
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

toolman281
I get the feeling that it isn’t what people like Aiken said – it is they said it in public
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

ak1967
Jindal must run as a Republican candidate. He is probably the most qualified in terms of education, and experience of any other candidate. Hopefully he will elevate the Republican debate as opposed to which candidate can be more fanatic and extremist like last time.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

Post Reader 10
10:00 AM EST
“Fanatic & Extremist” like last time??? WHO in the world are you referring to? Mitt Romney? Good God, Obama is an extremist to the max. He speaks one way then “leads” in another. He is destructive to the presidency & America.

· Flag

BayouPhilosopher
10:04 AM EST
Jindal’s policies are rapidly dismantling Louisiana’s charity hospital safety net and seriously damaging Louisiana State University in the process by merging them. His record is a train wreck. It shows the inherent arrogance of so many who think an Ivy League degree (Brown) and a Rhodes scholarship automatically qualify you for high national office. Just remember that Senator David Vitter of Louisiana was, somehow, also a Rhodes Scholar. You people in the Beltway / northeast U.S. need to recheck your scholarly biases.
Liked by 6 readers

· Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
10:05 AM EST
I’m with you Bayou.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

OldBlindDog
10:23 AM EST
Sorry, sir, I cannot agree that the merging of the LSU Medical systems with the Charity hospital is damaging either. Rather is strengthens the new charity hospital by giving it a revenue stream, and the prestige of being the foremost teaching hospital in LA, if not the Deep South. The storm killed the old system. It needed it. New construction rises along Canal and will bring jobs and better health care to the state.

· Flag

NowNcan
10:26 AM EST
Jindal, nothing is going to save the GOP, it is a party without hope and without a future. As long as the party has that rich white man mentality running the show the GOP is going nowhere.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

aaronfarber9
Yeah for not changing crazy beliefs and conceding Akin and Mourdock were wrong, now just keeping them quiet.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
Chris Christie eats two Bobby Jindal breakfast specials each morning at Denny’s. One just whets his appetite.
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

ak1967
9:54 AM EST
Christie does not have the education and knowledge of Jindal. And that will show up in the debates.

· Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
9:55 AM EST
Assuming that Jindal can even be seen over the lectern.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

OldBlindDog
9:58 AM EST
Sad, really, your entire canon of responses consist of insults. You are not interested in debate; you are merely pleasuring yourself by the light of a PC screen.
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
10:02 AM EST
I don’t debate ridiculous premises, like the assertion that Bobby Jindal is credible as a national GOP figure. His entire career arc has been spent simply grasping for the next-big-thing. At base, he is all ambition and nothing more.
Liked by 4 readers

· Flag

ClaudeUSVI
Jindal sounds more like a conservative Democrat rather than a Republican. He will forever be frustrated in a party that still believes that the South will rise again, the Civil War is not over, the Earth was created in about 6,000 years, biology is a false etc., etc., etc.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

OldBlindDog
10:01 AM EST
There is a movement afoot in the Republican party in which sane conservative voters will pressure their candidates to jettison the social aspects our differences, in favor of redirecting our efforts toward influencing fiscal policy.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

BayouPhilosopher
10:08 AM EST
You don’t know much about (current) conservative Democrats if you think Jindal. Perhaps you are thinking of Democrats like William Jennings Bryan and Woodrow Wilson but no one today. But your description of the Republican party is spot on.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Gwills24
What all these “new age” republicans are forgetting is that there will still be plenty of “old age” republicans in 2016. With the numbers already not in their favor vs Dems, talk like this will only serve to push away the fringe which is still live and well and a decent portion of the party. That said, there need to be more repubs like Jindal and Christie, its just too bad that their party doesnt have a shot on the presidential stage

· Reply · Share · Flag

DavidH3
I agree that Republicans should stay home and not go to Washington.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

ottoparts
9:50 AM EST
Actually it would be better if they all left the country for, oh, ten or twenty years.
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

bobnpvine1
A thousand Bobby Jindals can’t fix the Republican Party…Huh???That’s right… The Republican Party, in all of its election rigging has done such a masterful job of disenfranchising Democratic voters that over half the elected Republican House members come from gerrymandered districts that give all the power to the loonies…In other words, the Republicans are now trapped by their own trap… And it ain’t readily fixable…Bob

Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
Jindal is a cloying, opportunistic, grasping, overly-ambitious twirp. If he’s the face of the “new” GOP, good luck with that.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

mgochs
9:51 AM EST
You demosrate your ignorance with this comment about one of the most effective governors in the country. You may not like him but he has been effective.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
9:52 AM EST
I’ve followed his career closely. So let me rephrase. He is an opportunistic, grasping, overly-ambitious, cloying twirp. Better?
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
9:53 AM EST
P.S. Any Louisiana governor is by definition “effective” when oil and gas prices are high.
Liked by 4 readers

· Flag

OldBlindDog
9:55 AM EST
Just out of curiosity, what great state do you hail from?

· Flag

EnniferjayUbinray
10:03 AM EST
I “hail” from West Virginia.

· Flag

BayouPhilosopher
10:11 AM EST
Jindal is neither effective nor are oil prices particularly high. Natural gas prices are very low. BTW, how’s the price of WV coal these days? That’s a friendly fuel…

· Flag

ak1967
Jindal is well educated and has an excellent resume. But he has said many anti science and foolish things to please the conservative base.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

So let me get this straight…
This guy whose ultimate ambition it is to head the federal government is trying to position himself as a candidate for that position by making a speech advising others in his party to not focus on the federal government.
Would that be called ironic or hypocritical?
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

DavidH3
9:49 AM EST
He’s talking to moronics.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

DCLocal20
9:50 AM EST
That would be called par for the course. It’s actually pretty much reading from the same old GOP playbook that has spent the better part of the last 3+ decades demeaning public service and then scratching it’s head wondering why it doesn’t have any qualified candidates for public service positions (thinking back to the Bush II admin, in particular).
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

Hoya4692
9:57 AM EST
GOPers at the federal level are bad at governing because they hate the federal government and they hate federal employees.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

papafritz571
11:17 AM EST
And they are too stupid to admit they are the government and they are federal employees. What business wants to employ people who hate that business? What CEO wants people who have pledged to undermine the business for their own benefit? None of these politicians could qualify for legitimate jobs in industry. This is why they do so much for lobbying groups so when they lose office they can get jobs with them as promised when they accepted campaign donations.

· Flag

jandcgall1
Jindal will never win a GOP nomination for president. I shudder to think of him campaigning in a state like Texas. The racist there will destroy him and his family. It was bad for Obama, but Obama didn’t come to town on their party ticket. Imagine a man of color coming to town with the audacity to run on their party ticket.
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

ak1967
9:49 AM EST
Based on your comment, there is more of a reason for him to run and campaign in Texas to create a more perfect union

· Flag

wwestmoreland
9:50 AM EST
I would still rather have a Mexican-American lesbian President.

· Flag

BayouPhilosopher
10:20 AM EST
So what you’re saying is the voters of Louisiana are less racist than the people of Texas? You may well have a point there. Give credit to Louisiana.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Basil Crofter
It should be amusing to watch the RNC’s reaction. Whether or not Jindal has the presentation abilities and drive his point home, someone should try to step in as an adult in the Republican room. The GOP obviously needs some fresh ideas and more creative leadership.
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

papafritz571
11:21 AM EST
After listening to Jindal’s commentary after Obama’s State of Union address, we all thought he was some of kind rightwing joke that was being played on us. He sounded like a middle school kid, his comments didn’t even relate to the President’s speech and most of the public came away from watching wondering why on earth the RNC put him in charge of disparaging the President. He only disparaged himself and made the RNC look stupid.

· Flag

curwood
Now why can Jindal speak “truth to power” and when Governor Christie does the same … the wannabe candidates and the party hammer him … or try to?Wonder who the GOP will offer up for sacrifice in 2016?
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

jandcgall1
9:48 AM EST
The difference is Christie is white, Jindal is not. Christie gets the label of a fighter, a maverick. The man of color, Jindal, he gets labeled the ignorant ghetto dweller that doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

papafritz571
11:23 AM EST
I hope they bring back Bachmann, she was a laugh a minute. And her version of American history was hilarious.

· Flag

ronjeske
The guy is looking to get kicked out of the party. At that, he may be the only sane voice in the party.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Crickey7
Jindal is totally incoherent. He’s a string of sound bites that have no overarching vision other than a bleat of “Washington bad.”
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

karlmarx2
A suit is always going to look a size too big in little Bobby. He just doesn’t have enough personality to fill one.Likewise his presidential aspirations. He’s always going to look foolish running for president. It’s so obvious to everyone but him that he’s not up to the job.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

mikem1
“We had a number of Republicans damage the brand this year with offensive and bizarre comments. We’ve had enough of that.”ha. yeah. good luck keeping the lunatic fringe quiet.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

KrazyKat
Jinhdal speaks and they must really be shaking.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Jindal has all the charisma of a clam. Can’t wait to see him go up against Hillary or Joe.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

curwood
9:35 AM EST
wonder if the GOP will listen or follow his sensible advice. .funny .. you don’t hear the little man Rand Paul whining that “bobby has ruined his chances” like he did with Governor Christie.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

ce-kennedy
When he gives a speech, he looks like an elf reading a book report. Good luck with that in 2016.He seems reasoned and a nice person with no chance of being elected nationally as a republican.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

lifelongdemocrat
9:30 AM EST
You had me at elf.
Liked by 4 readers

· Flag

curwood
9:37 AM EST
But a person has little choice over this physical appearance … although I can’t look at Paul Ryan without getting nauseous … but that’s the radical gleam in his eyes and the bitter hate in the set of his thin lips …
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

higgsbosono
This pathetic creature is purportedly planning to run for President on an anti-Mad Dog platform?
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

1EgoNemo
9:24 AM EST
If you really like the way they do things in Louisiana, you’re going to love a Bobby Jindal presidency!
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

lifelongdemocrat
9:30 AM EST
He comes from one of America’s largest grifter states. They love big oil, political corruption and destroying their wetlands.
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

papafritz571
11:27 AM EST
And at least one of their Congressmen (Vitter) likes to be diapered when having sex with a paid prostitute. When ever I see Vitter and watch him speak I realize why he’d have to pay for someone to have sex with him. Ggggaaagggg!

· Flag

Senavifan
“Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who went after Hillary Clinton hard on Wednesday, says she got emotional in order to deflect his questions.”He should look at the tape. She got emotional because she disagreed with his emphasis and was making a point. She kicked his rear end.The problem with the GOPs cover up idea about Benghazi is it never made sense a a cover worth throwing. Four american were murdered. There were security failures. It does not matter much if it was a demonstration gone extreme or a terrorist plan. It’s a false difference. Honesty, it would have spoken even worse about the security situation in Libya had an unarmed demonstration gone extreme lead to US deaths.It was a cover-up never worth doing and the GOP guys have never really produced any evidence it happened.
Liked by 8 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

1EgoNemo
9:20 AM EST
If ‘getting emotional’ is a proper line of attack against a person’s character, then Johnson must think Speaker Boehner is the nation’s biggest loser.
Liked by 11 readers

· Flag

mitlen
9:32 AM EST
Ah, the old man calling a woman emotional trick. I’ve seen that one before.
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

curwood
9:39 AM EST
its the speaker who cries at the drop of a handkerchief …I was wondering if Johnson was going to accuse Mrs. Clinton of have her period next … men like him hate intelligent women.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

papafritz571
11:32 AM EST
Under Ronald Reagan, 243 Marines were bombed by terrorists and killed while sleeping in their barracks in Beirut. I do not recall the Republicons holding congressional hearings on the lack of security there. Insane McCain was never interviewed foaming at the mouth for that. His girlfriend Lindsay was still wearing short pants then and Darryl Issa was fighting charges of arson and car theft. Bobby Jindal chose to align himself with gypsies, tramps and thieves.
He should get out before his political aspirations are totally ruined by association.

· Flag

1EgoNemo
A rational person may vote for Jindal if and as soon as Louisiana is ever ranked 25th or higher in any state list of any basic, positive dimension of quality of life.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Radiation King
Receive the wisdom of BJ: “…we do not deserve to win.”Yea, and verily.
Liked by 14 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

bloomsatx
Why don’t we ever hear just one Republican presidential wanna-be denounce Fox News and the evident damage it has done to the so-called ‘brand’ among Americans who don’t watch it 24/7 or recognize it to be fairly unbalanced in its approach? I would admire and might actually vote for a person who could demonstrate the courage to do so.
Liked by 15 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

washpost1818
9:19 AM EST
Because they get kicked out the The Party. Witness how much Christie’s stock has dropped.
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

1EgoNemo
9:19 AM EST
Christie will run for re-election as an independent.
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

Elephantitus
Bobby, here’s the answer. FREE BOOZE! Looking at today’s GOP, all most of us see is the lower economic strata unable to think their way through things to realize they’re being had by a 1% minority who has the best politicians money can buy. Oh, and tell the Speaker that the President is not out to destroy the GOP as they’re doing just fine on their own.
Liked by 10 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

lonquest
11:01 AM EST
Free booze,… AND GUNS!Things Republicans need to feel like men.

· Flag

1EgoNemo
With a few exceptions, this nation’s corrupt state capitols are the seedbeds of Republican corruption and malfeasance, the nurseries where Congressional thieves and do-nothings are raised and trained.
Liked by 12 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
9:14 AM EST
Yep —— http://www.ALECexposed.comCheck to see how many of your GOP State legislators are owned by ALEC.
Liked by 7 readers

· Flag

dmartin79
How long does it take to build a new second party to compete on the national level? I doubt this can be done before the 2016 election, whether or not they call themselves New Republicans or the Tee Partee.
Another delusional R.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

1EgoNemo
9:13 AM EST
The last third party to make it major party status was an outfit called the Republican Party. It did that in 1856,
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

moebius22
Another strong up and comer. Still, 4 years is a long time.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

1EgoNemo
9:14 AM EST
You forgot the quotes around “strong.”
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

moebius22
9:17 AM EST
?

· Flag

1EgoNemo
9:22 AM EST
Jindal is a “strong” candidate, an up and “comer.”

· Flag

1EgoNemo
Jindal’s just using a lot of words to say something that is quite cynically simple –We’ve lost our iron grip on our cash cow, Washington. Let’s regroup where we still hold power — America’s corrupt and filthy statehouses, where our BS still works.
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

lwatkins4
Washington is not a phony economy. There is no economy without government. Without proper government oversight, the market will rapidly disintegrate and require a massive government bailout – costing far more than the proper oversight would have cost. Without the safety net of oversight and bailouts, there will quickly be nothing at all.
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
9:09 AM EST
And yet – Republicans, and especially Libertarian teabags – want virtually NO regulations!
especially on Wall Street.
Liked by 5 readers

· Flag

lwatkins4
9:31 AM EST
right, we had no wall street crisis at all from the new deal, up though Regan’s deregulation, so obviously what we did then worked really well. we started lifting many post-great-depression-era regulations under Regan in the 80′s resulting first in Savings and Loan crisis, followed by even more severe Wall Street crisis after another as more regulations were repealed. Due to lack of regulation, Wall Street keeps needing larger and larger bailouts due to ever more severe crisis. The market exits only because the government keeps it in order – without proper containment it has enormously destructive tenancies. The extent to which the market should exist inside or outside the government itself is subject to debate, but you can’t sustain a market without adequate government control. The current GOP obsession with ever-smaller government, shutting down the government, starving it of revenue and repealing regulations is nihilistic. nothing will survive.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

trucker348
9:50 AM EST
@lwatkins……
I could not agree more with you. However, let us not forget that it was because of Jimmy Carter that Reagan rode in on a white horse. I became a Reagan democrat in 1984 because I simply could not see Walter Mondale as president and it became obvious that no one (democrat) was available who qualified as presidential.The GOP is now in the same boat. This sqawking parrot is trying to position himself for vice-president and sadly, I say again, sadly, he probably will be if Christie DOES NOT (or gets passed over after telling these people what they don’t want to hear) run. Jindal has always struck me as a cruel Louisiana joke. He tries his gosh darnest to speak like a white man while the look on his face says “please try not to notice that I am not”. Sorry pal, the older folks in my family are from Louisiana and they shake their heads in disgust not wanting to believe the lows as to JUST WHERE POLITICS HAS FALLEN in that ol’ once was, God-fearing white Christian state that has been overrun by Mexicans and every other color of the rainbow from around the world.Don’t worry, Mr. Jindal. I and everyone else armed with that thing called common sense will laugh at you EVERYTIME you get read to open your mouth and speak about WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN LEAKED TO THE PRESS. By the way, can you PLEASE explain to me how a man as important as YOU somehow has ALL of his speeches leaked before he opens his mouth. I always thought those who are important would draw a crowd to the tv to hear his rants live. You seem to defy that. As a matter of fact, it seems as though you are being ridiculed by your own party.But hey, I only went to a community college and drove a tractor-trailer for eighteen years over the road. What the gosh darn heck would I know, huh?

· Flag

lwatkins4
9:53 AM EST
Jindal neglects that the red states receive far more fed. benefits than they pay into the system. While the Blue states are the reverse. Similarly areas of low population density within states, which always lean red, require far more resources than they generate, while high-density areas – which lean blue to very blue – are where the vast majority of this nations GDP is produced and dramatically lower per-capita resources are expended. The red districts are low-density welfare districts with low GDP output. Political representation is cleanly divided by a threshold population density for a given area.Low-density areas benefit from the extensive investments in rural infrastructure following the new deal. from doctors, to roads and bridges, power lines and water/sewer. All that infrastructure is now approaching the end of it’s life expectancy, and most suburban red-leaning districts will no longer have functional infrastructure in the very near future without massive investment by the federal government in new rural infrastructure. Spending that the GOP establishment opposes. This is a recipe for disaster which will make red districts unlivable. Blue-voting districts, on the other hand, can upgrade their infrastructure at far lower cost per-capita, due to higher population density. The population shift to high-population density blue districts is inevitable as these will be the only areas with functional infrastructure. And the increased population densities that result will push their voting patterns even bluer.Further, most of the GOP voting base is white and elderly. These folks are rapidly dying off.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

1EgoNemo
Washington stinks, but who in their right mind would want a Baton Rouge-centric perspective?
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

BOOKMARK
This is rich. Republicans now have to run away from the republican party to get elected? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha…………………………….!
Liked by 10 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

overexposed
Bobby Jindal talks a good talk but he is the worst possible person for any job, especially being a politician. Being a politician since graduating college is all he knows how to be and he lives in a world where as La. governor , your house and medical are paid with great retirement benifits. He thinks everyone lives like this and hasn’t grasped he is in a privileged position that few enter . He wants to PRIVATIZE GOVERNMENT ( EXCEPT FOR WHAT WOULD AFFECT HIM THAT IS ) , retirement for government employees is put in their hands to invest and possible lose, ( state is out of it, except for legislature and governor- state will still be responsible for their retirement). School vouchers for children to attend private schools, sounds good until you realize private usually take only the better children, no troublemakers or slow students, no challenged students and not all students will be accepted that apply. What happens is public school systems get and MUST take the remaining children and do it on less state money , good way to destroy public education is little money. And health care, I believe he claims to be a Christian , but his stand on health care shows a complete disregard for the poorer people in his state ( remember he has great medical ) . His mental health policy closes hospitals. All that does is shift the burden to individual parishes ( counties ). Where you had one hospital now you will need one in each parish, good use of resources Look at this person real closely and if he is the new republican party, I will vote democrat ( not yet completely ) as fast and as often as possible. This person is not fit to be third assistant dog catcher if the position is being eliminated. If you gather I am not a fan of his, you got it.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

1EgoNemo
9:03 AM EST
What your trying to say is noble in intent — that Christians ought to live up to the charitable example of Christ — but your result is, perhaps, unintended bigotry.Remember, our Constitution prohibits any religious test for office.It goes against the Founders to compare a politicians religion with their acts in office.Better to compare the politician to the values of the Constitution, which sets out as its purpose the provide for the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity.Same conclusion, but constitutionally correct — Do Jindal’s policies really provide for the general welfare, or do they help the welfare of a few? Do they secure the blessings of liberty for all, or do they grant license to a few?

The conclusion is the same, but one does not need to demean our Constitution with religious tests.

Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

JOHNWKLINE
9:11 AM EST
Truly a “snake in the grass”. Beware of Jindal. He is no friend of the people, especially on medical care and education. We want him out of Louisiana but not on the national state. BTW I am born and reared int Louisiana.
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

1EgoNemo
Wrong on the terrorism issue. No leader any more on defense matters. Now, the GOP’s ‘leading light’ suggests that the focus on supposed ‘fiscal competence” (which Jindal demeans as a focus on ‘ones and zeroes in a budget) isn’t their bag either.What remains to boast about?The nearly-empty bag that Jindal is holding contains what, feel-good platitudes?
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

ners1507
Jindal is just following the theme of House “retreat” last week, where the Rebus were advised to be careful what you say, but no change in policies, etc., such as not mentioning the word rape, etc.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

sky3ler
9:21 AM EST
In other words, despise and feel contempt for women and minorities, and for poor children, but stop saying it!
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Opechan
Still not ready for prime time– he has a “Kenneth Problem.” I relish the prospect of watching Jindal repeat his agonizing 2009 performance on the national stage. If you thought Romney was awkward, just wait until 2015.The main course will be the evisceration of “Piyush” Jindal and Marc Rubio by Chris Christie during the debates. Quality television in the making.
Liked by 4 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

1EgoNemo
8:59 AM EST
You’re right on everything, except Christie.By that time, Christie will be an independent or a Democrat.
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

kag1982
9:15 AM EST
Umm.. Why do you keep forcing Krispy Kreme on us? If you want him, please take him. But don’t whine when he starts bullying Hillary Clinton to win the Democratic nomination.As for Jindal, he is wicked smart, so I don’t think that he is going to be demolished in a debate, especially by a blowhard poser like Krispy Kreme. However, Rubio and Ryan are both much more charismatic than him. It’s easier for Rubio to overcome his lack of accomplishments than it is for Jindal to get a charisma injection.

· Flag

John1263
They continue to think ofntheir party as a marketing brand, and brand image. It is all about the product, sincenthey want tomtalk in consumerist terminology. You can package pig manure any way you like, but it still stinks to high heaven when you open the package.
Liked by 5 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

rbaldwin2
Truth to GOP power? To the Guns Over People party of old timers? You’re funny… This is a cheap attempt to try and put a brown man in front of Limbaugh’s sloth army and see if they blink…. NOPE….. Jimmy-dahl’s done.You people are just a joke….
Liked by 8 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Evan.Rosenberg@Gmail.Com
Jindal’s message is more than two decades over due. When Newt & Company took over the House and the GOP, that’s when moderates like me stopped considering their candidates. Then during the 00′s, they ran on “less government” platforms and did exactly the opposite, to create a “permanent majority”. Though they preach freedom, their stand on social issues runs 180 degrees from freedom, having the government tell its citizens how they can live. Though they say they are committed to the U.S. Constitution, but their propensity to send our kids off to foreign lands on false pretenses, to do nation building, without declaring war, is counter to what is required by that document. Their inflexibility to work on solutions to our problems have put them in their current position. It’s certainly not how their standard bearer, Ronald Reagan would act.
Liked by 8 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
imho — the only nationally known Republican that could possibly win the White House in 2016 is Huntsman.
But the entire gaggle of Republican voters is farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr removed from his sanity -
and wouldn’t be able to catch up to Reality by 2016.
Liked by 10 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

lostinthemiddle
8:44 AM EST
So long as there is a FOX News, Republicans like Huntsman will never win.
Liked by 9 readers

· Flag

criticalobserver
8:56 AM EST
Republican’s flirting with the Tea Party will be coming to an end probably after the 2016 elections. Then a new set of Republican leaders will emerge and they couldn’t possibly be worse than what we have now.
Liked by 3 readers

· Flag

BaronSiegfried
9:18 AM EST
Never, ever say that . . . God takes that sort of thing as a personal challenge. Given the madness which has infected the GOP, it is distinctly possible that the ’16 crop of Republicans will have succeeded in purging the party of even the slightest taint of reason, rationality, civility, or intelligence. Worse? There’s ALWAYS room for worse . . .
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

lonquest
11:00 AM EST
Just because Huntsman’s not visibly rabid doesn’t mean he’s got his head on straight, policy-wise.Never forget that behind the well-dressed, highly-conservative formet Utah governor stands a styrofoam mogul.

· Flag

Fairdeal
Jindal was the lead of the tea baggers just 2 years ago.
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

DaPirate
Ladies and gentlemen I present to you the real Bobby Jindal -
http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/a…

· Reply · Share · Flag

EuroAm
A fractious GOP begins their Wonder Wander not with a bang but with a denunciation…
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

abrooklynite
Forceful and Jindal in the same sentence. OK.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

eerock
So those people he’s throwing out of hospices In Lousiana, are they part of the 47 percent or the 53 percent?
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Nicester
This is a step in the disintegration of the Republican party and the formation of a new conservative coalition (which will include elements from today’s Democratic party).Either the smart Republicans like Jindal (pretty smart) and Christie (even smarter) will get purged from the party by the religious nuts, warmongers and other extremists, or the party will be successful in keeping the extremist wing of the party from determining the agenda, at which point they’ll probably leave the party.Either way there is no way for today’s Republican party to grow its influence. Either the party undergoes major reforms and purges, or it breaks up and a new party is formed, one that is based on fiscal conservativism, free enterprise, personal responsibility and federalism, but leaves out the religious nuts who care about issues like gay marriage and abortion, the warmongering neocons, the FEMA-hating conspiracy nuts, the NRA and so on.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
8:35 AM EST
The Jindals and Christies are FEW in number.
However, the BIG DONORS may weigh in….
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Nicester
8:38 AM EST
I think you’re right angie, and I think that’s already happened – the big money donors want to buy influence and don’t care about gay marriage or assault rifles. If the Republicans can’t deliver influence, the big money donors will go elsewhere.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

kag1982
9:18 AM EST
Christie isn’t smart. He is a blowhard bully. Discuss.Jindal, of course, is wicked smart and will remain in the party. Not going to become President, but will likely be HHS secretary.

· Flag

angie12106
Republicans erred by categorizing segments of society – placing them in separate boxes -
and appealing to each group with a different tact.But everytime Rmoney & Republicans spewed the racist LIE that Pres. Obama had ENDED or decreased
the Welfare work requirements -
Hispanics were listening and Asians and Whites and Women and Gays……and turned away from the GOP.Not necessarily because they were on Welfare – but because they knew it was a LIE.
Liked by 8 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

kag1982
9:21 AM EST
ZOMG.. Please stop pretending your a Republican. The “whining” about a policy argument being racist really suggests that you are gulping the Koolaid. Is it also racist to say that Barry likes big government and higher taxes? Is any criticism of the President racist?Just trying to set the bounds for fair debate.

· Flag

nfnik-washingtonpost
Being as he supports teaching creationism as science, appears to be quite skeptical of global warming, and has a number of other wacky beliefs, I’m not sure that Jindal is a complete antidote to offensive and bizzare beliefs based on fantasy that are popular with current republicans.
Liked by 9 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

criticalobserver
8:34 AM EST
If he really believes that creationism is science, that earth is 6000 years old and maybe flat, then forget about him. He is not going anywhere.
Liked by 10 readers

· Flag

nfnik-washingtonpost
8:36 AM EST
He has a biology degree from Brown and a need to pander to his voters in Louisiana and possibly on a larger stage. How he threads this is indicative, I think.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

washpost1818
Hey Bubby? While you’ve been positioning yourself for a run, you’ve been allowing your board of education to create an environment that has you joining TX as the two states from which I will not hire employees. Your rejection of science and reason has made your children undesirable for professional careers.
Liked by 24 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
8:24 AM EST
True — Jindal needs to clean up the craziness in his own state before taking his
show on the National road.
Liked by 12 readers

· Flag

withersb
I am a Democrat but I believe the country needs a viable two party system and they won’t have one unless the more competent Republicans like Christy, Jindal, etc. take thier party back, minimize FOX and attempt to take the party back to the mainstream.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
8:23 AM EST
But now that Fox & Frightwing radio craziness control Righties – that will be a difficult task.
Liked by 7 readers

· Flag

Nicester
8:35 AM EST
I agree with you withersb but think that it should be a different second party, not today’s Republicans.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

LuLuT
8:52 AM EST
What amazing about your comment is that you probably never watch Fox? I am also a democrat who watches a variety of news stations, including Fox. What is interesting to me is that many of the leading democrats and liberal pundits are invited to the network and are afforded the opportunity to stand up for their positions to a very large audience without rancor or ridicule. Have you ever seen that on any other network? ‘fraid not.

· Flag

angie12106
Republicans will need to do more than just talk about the economy -
they’ll actually need to STOP obstructing ALL jobs bills for Infrastructure that would create PRIVATE jobs
and boost the economy.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

gfoster56
Okay, nice start. Now, how about ideas and proposals? Republicans seem comfortable only when fighting AGAINST someone. They are good at scolding, but devoid of ideas.
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
8:22 AM EST
But Righties consider the Republicans’ FAKE OUTRAGE as “leadership.”
Liked by 4 readers

· Flag

HistoryBoy
In a lesser of two evils, at gunpoint I’d vote for him over Rand Paul.

· Reply · Share · Flag

kguy1
8:38 AM EST
Paul is the evil of two lessers.

· Flag

antiwingnut
8:38 AM EST
Did you see Rand Paul crawfish while being questioned on CNN concerning his comments to Hillary Clinton?

· Flag

coolcal71
What exactly is this right wing hypocrite whining about since his backwards little southern state receives more federal aid than its businesses and residents pay in federal taxes?
Liked by 11 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

PerryPassu
The Republicans are almost as bad as the Democrats for their love of pork. That’s why we need term limits for senators and representatives. After they’ve been in Washington too long they grow addicted to the spending.
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

angie12106
8:26 AM EST
Well earmarks were used to bribe…..er sweeten Congress critters to vote for certain bills -
but earmarks are supposedly no longer.However, in the Sandy Storm bill – there were LOTS of earmarks – and lo and behold! -
the Senate bill passed by a LARGE majority.
lol
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

chinchilla3
;Let’s see how all of America like Jindahl’s taxation idea, kill income tax and only use sales tax.If this is his idea of moving Republicans to accept reality and to try to balance a budget he’s an even bigger idiot than the people of his state who voted for him.
Liked by 2 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

PolishEngineer
“A debate about which party can better manage the federal government is a very small and short-sighted debate”Correct me if I’m wrong here, but isn’t that the quintessential debate?
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

Sensible31459
8:16 AM EST
No, that should be a consequence of the real debate about policy.

· Flag

margaretmeyers
Jindahl is right.
Between local networking and gerrymandering the GOP has succeeded in maintaining control of Pennsylvania despite there being close to a million more registered Democrats than Republicans. They have been able to move a lot of ALEC driven legislation through the state house and our congressional delegation is mostly Republican. The drawing of CDs is particularly masterful, and if the state did what Virginia is trying to do (change the way the Electoral College votes) we could end up helping to elect Presidents who don’t get the popular vote.
Jindahl’s proposal also follows a traditional, Republican state’s rights path. We Democrats need to pay attention and gain back some state houses.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

gnash2
8:19 AM EST
Election by popular vote is not the way the presidential election was set up. It was done with a purpose. What if the “mob” (overwhelming number of unemployed, some unique group, infiltration of foreigners, etc) gained control by vast numbers. That is the reason for the way it is set up. Look at the Constitution and Declaration. Find me one instance of the word Democracy. It is a Republic for a reason. Democracies throughout history have failed just for the reason I mention above.

· Flag

margaretmeyers
8:21 AM EST
If the Right worships the Constitution as much as they say they do, they will leave the Electoral College alone.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

Fairdeal
8:26 AM EST
gnash: do you agree with the structural changes (gerrymandering and voter suppression) that Republican governors are attempting to do it like it is happening in Virginia right now?
Is that what the constitution says?
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

LuLuT
8:47 AM EST
And you don’t think the democrats have done the same thing in other states? BOTH parties are at fault! Who ever is in power at the time of the census does the same thing … attempt to control the vote for the following 10 years until the next census. If you think this is a Republican thing only, read some history. (And for the record, I am a democrat who is disgusted with the leadership of both parties)

· Flag

concernedaboutdc
Read: He is going to argue that America is better off looking through the rear view mirror as opposed to progressing forward.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

gnash2
8:12 AM EST
What would you do if you knew that there was a cliff ahead.?
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

margaretmeyers
8:18 AM EST
gnash, if there was a cliff ahead, I wouldn’t be looking in the rear view mirror: I would be looking forward and steering a new path. There is nothing in the rear view mirror that is going to help me in your situation.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

BobbyYarush
Wow…. Very Good. This is exactly what is wrong in the GOP. It seems to me that the “Washington” GOP has certainly lost site of what is taking place in the rest of the country…. but of course I consider the Democrats in Washington having done the same… but to a lesser extent. The GOP is in a “Hyper Conservative” mode… and they don’t even have the sense to realize that this isn’t working for them. I do believe its primarily the fault of the upper statesmen in the GOP… with threats to their own party members that don’t allow for any forward progress… this has always been the way politics works in Washington… its finally catching up to them… and is the root of their demise. They better wake up… or the GOP is going to lose any power they do grasp on too.
Liked by 1 reader

· Reply · Share · Flag

denis189
Mr. Jindal has been Governor of Louisiana for 5 years. His state is last or near last in education, health and infrastructure. It is 44th in median household income. AND it receives a Federal Subsidy of $0.78 for every dollar it pays in taxes. It is, in short, living on handouts from other states. His running for President is like the Prime Minister of Greece running to lead the European Union.
Liked by 21 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

rcvinson64
Jindal won’t even use his real name. Stay in your crooked state and keep pushing creationism.
Liked by 7 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

laboo
Things fall apart, the right wing cannot hold. Mere Teabaggery is loosed upon the world.
Liked by 3 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Bosworth2
Republicans like Jindal and Christie are likely the future of the GOP. Of course, this means that they will both be subject to heightened attacks from Democrats (and their sympathizers in the media), who struggle to caricature the GOP as exclusively white (it is not – a majority white, perhaps but not exclusively); overweight (yeah – and Democrats are all the model of physical fitness); redneck (I would presume that many urban-dwelling Republicans are not farmers); and stupid (a dismissive charge leveled at anyone – even themselves sometimes – as a means of ending debate).

· Reply · Share · Flag

airberger
8:02 AM EST
I hadn’t heard the “overweight” one before. I think you may have gotten carried away.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

Bosworth2
8:03 AM EST
I haven’t gotten carried away. The churlish characterizations of the GOP have gotten carried away.

· Flag

laboo
8:04 AM EST
A weighty analysis, to be sure.

· Flag

airberger
8:04 AM EST
I buy the other caricatures you cite. Just not that one. I think you made it up.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

jeffRI1
8:15 AM EST
They will also be attacked by Republicans – you don’t know your own brand very well – do you?
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

antiwingnut
8:47 AM EST
bosworth, I assume that you did not watch the republican primary debates.
But the attacks of republicans on Romney turned out not to be attacks but “facts”.
Liked by 1 reader

· Flag

Fairdeal
How does Jindal feel about voter supression?
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

antiwingnut
8:48 AM EST
He has never seen a Democratic voter that he would not like to surpress.

· Flag

airberger
“Bobby Jindal speaking truth to GOP power”This title is completely misleading. Jindal can speak out against Congressional Republicans precisely because they have so little power now. Where was this brave talk 2 years ago, when the mighty Tea Party swarmed into office?
Liked by 12 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

Bosworth2
8:02 AM EST
Uh, I think the Tea Party members who “swarmed” into Congress two years ago are still there.

· Flag

airberger
8:03 AM EST
You’ll have to point out the part of my post where I said they weren’t still there. I simply said their power has diminished. Read more slowly.
Liked by 8 readers

· Flag

jimfilyaw
this goober has got one big problem. a lot of people have decent memories and the ability to distinguish b.s. from apple butter. he sounds like liein’ ryan trying to sound offended because obama called him out on social security and medicare. facts tend to be annoying (and with a well known liberal bias).
Liked by 6 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

jeffRI1
Both Jindal and Christie recognize that the Republican party needs to change in deep and substantial ways. Getting the power-brokers within the party to make that change is another matter altogether. Jindal also needs to be honest with himself about the source of our federal government’s failure over the past 30 years – the responsibility for much of our current economic mess, the reason wages have stagnated and benefits declined while corporate and stockholder profits soared, the source for divisiveness and a preoccupation with discrimination is his own party. Additionally, both Jindal and Christie (along with Marco Rubio) have sufficient baggage to make their Presidential hopes a true long shot for any time in the foresable future.
Liked by 10 readers

· Reply · Share · Flag

laboo
8:07 AM EST
They both want it to change, but each wants it to change in a different direction. It’ll be like watching the formation of the solar system — in reverse.
Liked by 2 readers

· Flag

  • © 1996-2013 The Washington Post

Bobby Jindal to Poor Louisianans: Drop Dead

Jamelle Bouie

January 22, 2013

The Louisiana governor eliminates hospice care for Medicaid recipients.

Last week, I wrote on how Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal was transforming his state’s tax system, from a mixed collection of corporate, income and sales taxes, to one where corporate and income taxes have been eliminated, and sales taxes are hiked to make up for lost revenue. In other words, Jindal wants to turn Louisiana’s marginally progressive tax structure into a fully regressive one, which places its largest tax burden on its most vulnerable citizens.

If Jindal were also proposing a large expansion of state services, this would make sense. Overall, the progressivity of the tax burden is less important than the level of redistribution. A state with regressive taxes but robust public benefits is better for lower-income people than one with progressive taxes but few benefits.

Unfortunately, that doesn’t describe Jindal’s Louisiana. To wit, he has authorized elimination of the state’s hospice program for Medicaid recipients. According to a local New Orleans news station, Louisiana residents over the age of 21 will stop receiving hospice benefits at the end of the month. As of February, low-income Louisianans with terminal illnesses and disabilities will lose access to long-term home and medical care.

The Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals defends this as a cost-saving measure: Over the next two years, Louisiana will save $8.3 million by ending state-funded hospice care. But that’s a paltry sum compared to the state’s $900 million deficit. And in the same way that raising Medicare eligibility increases costs by moving seniors into more expensive private insurance plans, these cuts will, in the end, place a greater burden on the state, as low-income Louisianans turn to nearby hospitals and ICUs, shifting the burden to localities.

In isolation, it’s a disaster of a plan. When coupled with existing cuts to education and a large tax increase on the bottom 80 percent of Louisiana residents, it’s a catastrophe. Indeed, Jindal seems devoted to engineering a Louisiana that works little for its most vulnerable citizens, and does as much as possible to satisfy the wants of wealthy, entrenched interests.

Comments

KhadijahbintMuhammad

Wed, 2013-01-23 07:53

Permalink

“A state with regressive taxes but robust public benefits is better for lower-income people than one with progressive taxes but few benefits.”

Obviously. But that’s not what’s under debate, really.

Jindal, like the rest of the fiscally conservative governors, realize that a JOB is of far more financial value to an individual than a dole. Or, put another way, the total received value of all entitled doles never adds up to the total received value of even a low-wage job. If it does, your society quickly goes into a tailspin and you have to readjust (if you doubt that, do a little research on how Sweden has pulled back on tax rates and beneifts over the last forty years.)

In the states, reality bites hard. There are no language or major cultural barriers between moving from California to Texas, so it happens not infrequently as the taxation AND job opportunity systems benefit the latter. Louisiana, additionally hampered by a state income tax system which has a loophole for every business that would donate to or drink with Edwin Edwards and his famously corrupt predecessors.

Bobby wants part of the Texas in-migration of business before he becomes President. To get that, he needs to reform what is likely the worst tax code in the nation (sales, property, income) which is famous for unfair set-asides. To do that, you create a backbone structure you can then adapt to future needs.

Let him do so without the armchair quarterbacking. And, to address your crocodile tears about the “poor”, keep in mind that a HUGE proportion of the out-migration of low-income people after Katrina STAYED IN TEXAS, because the quality of life there for them (including services) was better than in Louisiana.,

jrljr7

Wed, 2013-01-23 08:07

Permalink

Why don’t liberals recognize that ALL taxes are regressive, if not as obvious? The only difference, as usual, is that this author believes taxation for govt redistribution – highly inefficient – while conservatives know a better economic climate will encourage growth and employment, reduced cost of living and the need for inefficient redistribution.

strainseur

Wed, 2013-01-23 08:16

Permalink

“Home hospice care usually costs less than care in hospitals, nursing homes, or other institutional settings. This is because less high-cost technology is used and family and friends provide most of the care at home.” –American Cancer Society

It seems to me that cutting spending on hospice care may be counterproductive.

Steph76711

Wed, 2013-01-23 09:40

Permalink

By the moronic logic being expressed in these comments, you would expect the South to be the most prosperous region in the country, since no other region of the country has a “better” economic climate. The South was the poorest part of the country 150 years ago; after 150 years of generally benighted conservative dominance it is STILL the poorest part of the country; and it will probably still be the poorest part of the country in 2163. If they keep electing conservatives, there’s no doubt of it.

rrdrrd

Wed, 2013-01-23 12:26

Permalink

The low information/slow thought process limitations of the American political left strike again – in this article and especially in this post. First, note that the South was the Solid South for DEMOCRATS during most of those 150 years, with Republicans coming to the forefront only in the last 20-30 and an uphill battle on their hands to overcome the situation that had developed under generations of monolithic Democrat control.

And they have succeeded. Steph, I know this is going to confuse you and be extremely hard for you to understand but things have changed in the South since the 60′s. Everything has not stood still since the heyday of the American left. Racism is now most predominant in the northern cities (you know, the ones run by Democrat machine politics – go ahead an look up the most segregated places in America; they are not in the South. You will also find their is a steady migration of Blacks back to the South for better opportunities and better treatment – http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/22/nyregion/many-black-new-yorkers-are-mo… )

As for poverty – wake up, the South is where the jobs are and the cost of living is cheaper. For decades, the leftist bureaucrats of the Federal government have tried to mislead people about the real nature of poverty in this country. Too many blue states needed to look superior to the allegedly poor South in order to contunue their failed experiments in welfare. However, even bureaucracy has to face reality eventually and they changed from the archaic “poverty threshold” (which was the same everywhere, regardless of cost of living) and developed the Supplemental Poverty Measure – something that much more accurately demonstrates financial reality.

So what parts of the country are really POOR! It is not the South, it is not the Midwest. Oh no, fly-over country is doing fine. This sick beasts are on the coasts with the number 1 highest rate of real poverty belonging directly to the ultra-blue state of California with a whopping 23.5% of its population living in dire straights (http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p60-244.pdf). Who is next? Who else but the most wildly Democrat driven place in America, the District of Columbia (at 23.2)! Of course, we should have known this already because they also lead the nation in welfare recipients per capita (

Where does Bobby Jindal’s state stand in terms of poverty??? A little above the national average (17 percent versus 15.8) but that still means that CA and DC have about 35% more per folks per capita than the poor downtrodden souls of LA. Texas and Mississippi are both doing better than LA that with decrepit Missisiippi actual right at the national average. Who else is doing well – both Carolinas, Tennesee, West Virginia, Kentucky and Alabama are all well below the national average.

Steph, you probably should not use the term “moronic” without looking in a mirror.

ThinkingDem

Thu, 2013-01-24 11:11

Permalink

There’s that “Democrat controlled South” canard again. The truth is, the ruling political ideology under today’s Southern Republicans is the very same ideology (and has included some of the same politicians and voters) as the old Southern Democrats, who in 1948 ran Strom Thurmond for President under the label Dixiecrat. The national Democratic party (national meaning non-Southern) rebuilt itself with workers, some farmers, immigrants of non-Anglo-Saxon-Puritan culture, etc. after the Civil War, to fight for the economic and cultural rights of lower and middle income non-WASP voters. In the South, they had to put up with the old guard (after Reconstruction was ended too early) in order to be a viable party, and the Southern “Dixiecrats” had an uneasy alliance with national Democrats, in order to get federal funds to recover economically; they agreed not to talk about racism (see Huey Long) in order to avoid a breakup and get federal pork projects (TVA, Oak Ridge, military bases, etc.). The racists hated Eleanor, but needed Franklin and his programs.

When Truman desegregated the Armed Forces in 1948, the Dixiecrats tried to revolt, but they were not economically strong enough to do so until after the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964. Then began the long transition by which Dixiecrats became Republicans, and TRUE Democrats remained in the party of Jefferson. And all that experience with non-WASP voting blocs gave us an empathy toward the downtrodden, rather than a desire to trod them down some more, as Bobby Jindal and others propose.

However, the new GOP is worse than the old Democratic party in several ways, most notably in that, rather than allow both religious/cultural conservatives and economic-only conservatives to hold power in their own regions, they have allowed the poison of racism to rule their entire national party as well as the Southern branches.

Historically, the Dixiecrat-turned-Republican states have all (except for Texas, which is just so darn BIG its economy is better than the rest) had to accept MORE help from the feds than they send into Washington in taxes, while the “blue” states pay more in taxes than they receive (or NEED to receive) in federal benefits. Further, the “blue” states as a rule can help more of their poor before they need federal funds, because they have the prosperity to be taxed and the progressive attitudes to do so.

So, let the “red” states secede, it will be better for the budget of the new USA without them. Just wait till I can move to a blue state before a passport would be needed, then secede. The average IQ of Americans will improve also.

moderateGuy

Wed, 2013-01-23 11:30

Permalink

I know facts, reason, rationality does not matter to someone like Bouie, but, a recent study done by economist Jens Arnold for OECD (you know the club of those countries that provide best prospects for their citizens) suggests that the corporate income tax was the most harmful to economic growth, followed by the personal income tax, while taxes on consumption and property had the least impact on an economy.
Even fithere a study by Arnold and four other economists using OECD data estimated that every one percent shift in tax revenues away from income taxes towards other levies produced an additional one-quarter to one percentage point gain in economic growth, you know the thing that provides, whatchamacallem, jobs.
And as far back as 50 years ago Harvard Professor Stanley Surrey, JFK’s assistant treasury secretary for tax policy, did a study that suggested that spending through the tax code on social goals was less effective than direct government expenditures, expenditures that could actually be raised if your economy grows faster.
OK, this brief window on reality closes, back to your fantasy world, Bouie.

thesafesurfer

Wed, 2013-01-23 11:44

Permalink

Obama said we need “bold, persistent experimentation.” It seems that not all experimentation is allowed. We can experiment greatly increasing spending, greatly raising taxes, greatly expanding the size of the federal government, and greatly growing the scope of federal power over the most intimate relationships in our lives.

We can’t experiment reducing taxes, reducing spending, reducing the size of government, and reducing the intrusion of government into our perosnal lives.

So the talk about experimentation is just a bald-faced lie in the end. This is the face of statism.

ThinkingDem

Thu, 2013-01-24 11:15

Permalink

We did that “experiment” during the Reagan/Bush and then the W. Bush years. The result was increasing relative poverty for poor and middle class citizens, while a new Gilded Age created bigger billionaires than ever, climaxed by the Great Recession (like 1921 to 1929). If you were fortunate enough to be in the top one percent, or fortunate enough not to have lost your job and home YET, you may not have felt the pain.

And Republicans do not mind intrusive government to make sure that you follow the religious preferences of your employer and politicians (in preference to those of your OWN religion). Remember Governor Ultrasound?

LillithMc

Wed, 2013-01-23 11:52

Permalink

Instead of “drop dead” it is more like “please disappear”. We don’t want your suffering to hurt business. The two themes of US politics are the split between having social programs and using a business matrix that ignores social needs. Supposedly only those paying taxes count as in only white men owning property can vote. Except even when white men had the vote, wealthy white men had court-ordered responsibility for those who needed shelter and work. Perhaps it was slave labor, but never did we totally ignore social need. Time to to get real and stop the red state posturing. Or perhaps we will divide ourselves by moving to either red or blue states. Right now the blue states pay more to the red states.

michael0421

Wed, 2013-01-23 12:34

Permalink

This is one more tired, platitude-poisoned article lamenting “the most vulnerable” (a euphemism for ‘welfare careerist’) is going to have something not given to them any longer which they have not earned. That day of reckoning is here Mr. Bouie. And it’s never going back to FDR era wealth transfer again. The wealthy have sacrificed enough. It’s time for people who have not managed their personal lives and finance to become accountable.

ng2951

Wed, 2013-01-23 14:49

Permalink

No such thing as a progressive tax. As for redistribution if it worked people on welfare would not be in poverty. Malcom X warned against taking this kind of charity as it would make you dependent on the government and destroy your character.

If the regressive tax attracts more business, which the indications are it will, then the creation of jobs that go with them will do more for the poor than all the government programs. That is why liberals are scared of them.

People on welfare wait for checks. They live in poor housing, have poor prospects, never have an opportunity for improvement. The libs are lucky they sell their sell votes so cheaply.

The poor should ask the lib patrons, “where’s my house? where’s my car? when do I get to spend a week at Disney or the like? Why are you flying to Hawaii, Martha’s Vineyards, Las Vegas on my dime? Why do you get medical treatment in the best hospitals when I have to sit in a broken down one?”

If they would listen to conservatives they would get their job. In a few years they would have their house and nice car. A year or so after that they would take their whole family on vacations to wherever they chose. They would retire one day and watch there children enjoy the same successes they did.

That is what the “Jindahls” want for them.

Or they can do what they have done for over 50 years and get the same thing they have for that time.

© 2013 by The American Prospect

Bobby Jindal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Bobby Jindal
Jindal in June 2011
55th Governor of Louisiana
Incumbent
Assumed office
January 14, 2008
Lieutenant
Preceded by Kathleen Blanco
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Louisiana‘s 1st district
In office
January 3, 2005 – January 14, 2008
Preceded by David Vitter
Succeeded by Steve Scalise
Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation of the U.S. Department of HHS
In office
2001–2003
President George W. Bush
President of the University of Louisiana System
In office
1999–2001
Governor Murphy Foster
Louisiana Secretary of Health and Hospitals
In office
1996–1998
Governor Murphy Foster
Personal details
Born Piyush Jindal
June 10, 1971 (age 41)
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, U.S.
Nationality American
Political party Republican
Spouse(s) Supriya Jolly
Children
    • Selia Elizabeth
    • Shaan Robert
    • Slade Ryan
Residence Governor’s Mansion
Alma mater Brown University
New College, Oxford
Profession Politician
Religion Roman Catholicism
Signature
Website Official website

Piyush “Bobby” Jindal (born June 10, 1971)[1] is an American politician and the 55th and current Governor of Louisiana.[2] Born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to immigrants from India, Jindal studied biology and public policy at Brown University from 1988 to 1991. After receiving his M.Litt in political science from New College, Oxford, he worked in McKinsey & Company and interned for Representative Jim McCrery of Louisiana. In 1996, governor Murphy Foster appointed Jindal Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, and in 1999 he was appointed president of the University of Louisiana System. In 2001, Jindal was appointed as the principal adviser to the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services by President George W. Bush.

He unsuccessfully contested the Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2003 as the Republican Party candidate, but won a seat in the United States House of Representatives in the 2004 election in Louisiana. The first Indian American in Congress, he won reelection in 2006. Bobby Jindal won the Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2007, after which he handled disaster response to Hurricane Gustav in 2008 and delivered the Republican response to the Barack Obama speech to joint session of Congress, February 2009. His political positions are generally conservative; he opposes abortion, same-sex marriage, and flag burning, while supporting gun rights, a border fence, and teaching intelligent design. Jindal won a second term as Governor in 2011. A Catholic convert from Hinduism, Jindal has been married to Supriya Jolly since 1997 with whom he has three children.

Contents

Early life, education, and business career

Jindal was born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to Amar and Raj Jindal, who came to the United States as immigrants from Punjab, India, six months before he was born.[3] Jindal attended Baton Rouge Magnet High School, graduating in 1988. While in high school, he competed in tennis tournaments, and started a computer newsletter, a retail candy business, and a mail-order software company. He spent his free time working at the concession stands during LSU football games.[4] Jindal was one of 50 students nationwide admitted to the Program in Liberal Medical Education (PLME) at Brown University, guaranteeing him a place in medical school. Jindal completed majors in biology and public policy. He graduated in 1991 at the age of 20, with honors in both majors.[4][5]

Jindal was named to the 1992 USA Today All-USA Academic Team. He applied to and was accepted by both Harvard Medical School and Yale Law School, but studied at New College, Oxford, as a Rhodes Scholar. He received an M.Litt. degree in political science with an emphasis in health policy from the University of Oxford in 1994, where the subject of his thesis was “A needs-based approach to health care”.[4] He turned down an offer to study for a D.Phil. in politics, instead joining the consulting firm McKinsey & Company.[6] He then interned in the office of Rep. Jim McCrery of Louisiana, where McCrery assigned him to work on healthcare policy; Jindal spent two weeks studying Medicare to compile an extensive report on possible solutions to Medicare’s financial problems which he presented to McCrery.[7]

As a young convert to Christianity, Jindal wrote several articles about his spiritual journey that were published in the New Oxford Review.[6]

Early political career (1993–2003)

Foster administration

President Barack Obama talks with Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal and U.S. Coast Guard Commandant Admiral Thad Allen, May 2010

In 1993 U.S. Representative Jim McCrery (whom Jindal had worked for as a summer intern) introduced him to Governor Murphy Foster.[8] In 1996 Foster appointed Jindal as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, an agency that represented about 40 percent of the state budget and employed over 12,000 people. Foster called Jindal a genius who has a lot of knowledge of medicine.[9] Jindal was 24 at the time.[10] During his tenure, Louisiana’s Medicaid program went from bankruptcy with a $400 million deficit into three years of surpluses totaling $220 million.[11] Jindal was criticized during the 2007 campaign by the Louisiana AFL-CIO for closing some local clinics to reach that surplus.[12] Under Jindal’s term, Louisiana nationally rose to third place in child healthcare screenings, with child immunizations rising, and introduced new and expanded services for the elderly and the disabled.[13] In 1998, Jindal was appointed executive director of the National Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare, a 17-member panel charged with devising plans to reform Medicare. In 1999, at the request of the Louisiana Governor’s Office and the Louisiana State Legislature, Jindal examined how Louisiana might use its $4.4 billion share of the tobacco settlement.

At 28 years of age in 1999, Jindal was appointed to become the youngest-ever president of the University of Louisiana System, the nation’s 16th largest system of higher education with over 80,000 students per year.[14]

Bush administration

In March 2001 he was nominated by President George W. Bush to be Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for Planning and Evaluation.[15] He was later unanimously confirmed by a vote of the United States Senate and began serving on July 9, 2001. In that position, he served as the principal policy adviser to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.[16] He resigned from that post on February 21, 2003, to return to Louisiana and run for governor.[17] He was assigned to help fight the nurse shortage by examining steps to improve nursing education.[18]

2003 election for governor

Jindal came to national prominence during the 2003 election for Louisiana governor.

In what Louisianans call an “open primary” (but which is technically a nonpartisan blanket primary), Jindal finished first with 33 percent of the vote. He received endorsements from the largest paper in Louisiana, the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the newly elected Democratic mayor of New Orleans, Ray Nagin; and the outgoing Republican governor, Mike Foster. In the second balloting, Jindal faced the outgoing lieutenant governor, Kathleen Babineaux Blanco of Lafayette, a Democrat. Despite winning in Blanco’s hometown, he lost many normally conservative parishes in north Louisiana, and Blanco prevailed with 52 percent of the popular vote.

Political analysts have speculated on myriad explanations for his loss. Some have blamed Jindal for his refusal to answer questions targeted at his religion and ethnic background brought up in several Democratic advertisements,[19][20] which the Jindal Campaign called “negative attack ads.” Others note that a significant number of conservative Louisianans remain more comfortable voting for a conservative Democrat, than for a Republican. Despite his losing the election in 2003, the run for governor made Jindal a well-known figure on the state’s political scene and a rising star within the Republican party.

U.S. House of Representatives (2005–2008)

Jindal as a U.S. Congressman

Elections

2004
See also: United States House of Representatives elections in Louisiana, 2004

A few weeks after the 2003 gubernatorial runoff, Jindal decided to run for Louisiana’s 1st congressional district. The incumbent, David Vitter, was running for the Senate seat being vacated by John Breaux. The Louisiana Republican Party endorsed him in the primary although Mike Rogers, also a Republican, was running for the same seat. The 1st District has been in Republican hands since a 1977 special election and is widely considered to be staunchly conservative.[21] Jindal also had an advantage because his campaign was able to raise over $1 million very early in the campaign, making it harder for other candidates to effectively raise funds to oppose him. He won the 2004 Election with 78 percent of the vote.

2006
See also: United States House of Representatives elections in Louisiana, 2006

Jindal won re-election to a second term with 88% of the vote.

Tenure

He was the second Indian American elected to Congress.[22] He has reportedly lived in Kenner,[23] Metairie, and Baton Rouge.[24]

In 2005, Jindal criticized Bush’s budget for not calling enough spending cuts.[25] He warned of the growth of Medicaid saying “Congress may act without them…there seems to be growing momentum that the status quo is not defensible.”[26] Jindal praised Bush’s leadership on social security reform saying “The administration has a lot more work to do to continue educating the American people about the very serious challenges facing Social Security.”[27]

In response to Hurricane Katrina, Jindal stated “If we had been investing resources in restoring our coast, it wouldn’t have prevented the storm, but the barrier islands would have absorbed some of the tidal surge.”[28]

Committee assignments

He was made Vice-Chairman of the House Subcommittee on the Prevention of Nuclear and Biological Attacks. Jindal served as President of the incoming Freshman class of congressmen in 2004. He was elected to the position of House Assistant Majority Whip, a senior leadership role; he served in this capacity from 2004 to 2006.[4]

2007 election for governor

See also: Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2007

On January 22, 2007, Jindal announced his candidacy for governor.[29] Polling data showed him with an early lead in the race, and he remained the favorite throughout the campaign. He defeated eleven opponents in the nonpartisan blanket primary held on October 20, including two prominent Democrats, State Senator Walter Boasso of Chalmette and Louisiana Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell of Bossier City, and an independent, New Orleans businessman John Georges.

Jindal finished with 699,672 votes (54 percent). Boasso ran second with 226,364 votes (17 percent). Georges finished with 186,800 (14 percent), and Campbell, who is also a former state senator, ran fourth with 161,425 (12 percent). The remaining candidates collectively polled three percent of the vote. Jindal polled pluralities or majorities in 60 of the state’s 64 parishes (equivalent to counties in other states). He lost narrowly to Georges in Orleans Parish, to Boasso in St. Bernard Parish (which Boasso represented in the Legislature), and in the two neighboring north Louisiana parishes of Red River and Bienville located south of Shreveport, both of which are historically Democratic and supported Campbell. In the 2003 contest with Blanco, Jindal had lost most of the northern parishes.[30] This marked the first time that a non-incumbent candidate for governor was elected without a runoff under the Louisiana election system.[31]

Governor of Louisiana (2008 – present)

First term

As governor-elect Jindal named a new ethics team, with Democratic Shreveport businesswoman Virginia Kilpatrick Shehee, the first woman to have served in the state senate, as the vice chairman of the panel. Jindal assumed the position of governor when he took the oath of office on January 14, 2008. At thirty-six, he became the youngest sitting governor in the United States. He is also Louisiana’s first non-white governor since P. B. S. Pinchback served for thirty-five days during Reconstruction, and the first non-white governor to be elected (Pinchback succeeded to the position of Lieutenant Governor on the death of Oscar Dunn, then to Governor upon the impeachment of Henry Clay Warmoth).[32] Additionally, Jindal became the first Indian American to be elected governor of any state in the United States.[33][34] In 2008, Jindal was ranked one of the nation’s most popular governors with an approval rating of 77%.[35][36]

In a salute to the 2007 LSU Tigers football national championship team during his January 14, 2008 inauguration speech, Jindal stated in part “…They revere our athletes. Go Tigers….”[37]

On May 3, 2008 a special election was held to determine Jindal’s replacement in the 1st Congressional District. Steve Scalise, a state legislator, was elected with 75 percent of the vote over University of New Orleans professor Dr. Gilda Reed.[38]

On June 27, 2008, Louisiana’s Secretary of State confirmed that a recall petition had been filed against Governor Jindal in response to Jindal’s refusal to veto a bill that would more than double the current state legislative pay. During his campaign for Governor, Jindal had pledged to prevent legislative pay raises that would take effect during the current term.[39][40] Jindal responded by saying that he is opposed to the pay increase but that he had pledged to let the legislature govern themselves.[41] On June 30, 2008, Governor Jindal reversed his earlier position by vetoing the pay raise legislation, stating that he made a mistake by staying out of the pay raise issue. In response, the petitioners dropped their recall effort.[42]

The Standard and Poor’s raised Louisiana’s bond rating and credit outlook from stable to positive in 2009. In announcing this change, the organization gave credit to the state’s strong management and “commitment to streamlining its government functions.”[43] Jindal met with President Barack Obama in October 2009 where the governor pushed for increased federal dollars to cover rising Medicaid costs, speeding the construction of hurricane-protection barriers, and financing the proposed Louisiana State University teaching hospital. During a town hall meeting, Obama praised Jindal as a “hard working man who is doing a good job” for the State, and expressed support for the Governor’s overhaul of the State’s educational system in the area of increased charter schools.[44]

Louisiana state government watchdog C.B. Forgotston, former counsel to the House Appropriations Committee who supported Jindal’s election in 2007, has expressed disappointment with the governor in regard to the legislative pay raise and other fiscal issues. Forgotston, said he would grade Jindal an A+ in public relations and a D in fiscal performance in office.[45]

Jindal negotiated an agreement whereby Foster Farms, a private chicken processor, would receive $50 million in taxpayer funds to purchase a chicken processing plant owned by bankrupt Pilgrim’s Pride.[46] Some have argued that there is a conflict of interest in that Pilgrim’s Pride founder Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim contributed $2500 to Jindal’s campaign in 2007.[47] Other contributors to Jindal’s campaign who benefited from economic development spending include Albemarle and Edison Chouest Offshore. Jindal however released a statement saying that this legislation saved over 1,000 jobs, serves as a stimulus to Louisiana’s economy, and had wide bipartisan support.[48]

Hurricane Gustav

Then President George W. Bush and Governor Bobby Jindal greeting EOC employees, during disaster recovery efforts for Hurricane Gustav, September 2008

Jindal oversaw one of the largest evacuations in U.S. history (nearly two million people) in late August 2008 prior to the Louisiana landfall of Hurricane Gustav.[49] He issued mandatory evacuation orders for the state’s coastal areas and activated 3,000 National Guardsman to aid in the exodus. He also ordered the state to purchase generators to provide needed power to hospitals and nursing homes without power. Government officials vacated hospitals and nursing homes and put the poor, the ill, and the elderly on buses and trains out of town. The evacuation was credited as one reason that Gustav only resulted in 16 deaths in the U.S. The state’s successful response to Hurricane Gustav was in stark contrast to the failed hurricane response system for Hurricane Katrina in 2005. Jindal received bipartisan praise for his leadership during Gustav.[50][51] Jindal had been scheduled to address the Republican National Convention, but cancelled his plans to focus on Louisiana’s needs during the storm.[52]

Speculation over vice presidential nomination

Jindal at a John McCain campaign event in Kenner, Louisiana, June 2008

On February 8, 2008, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh mentioned on his syndicated show that Jindal could be a possible choice for the Republican vice presidential nomination in 2008. He said that Jindal might be perceived as an asset to John McCain‘s campaign because he has wide support in the conservative and moderate wings of the Republican Party and his youth offsets McCain’s age. If McCain had won the presidency, he would have been the oldest president ever inaugurated to a first term.[53] Heightening the speculation, McCain invited Jindal, Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida, Gov. Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota and McCain’s former rivals Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee to meet at McCain’s home in Arizona on May 23, 2008, according to a Republican familiar with the decision; Romney, Huckabee, and Pawlenty, all of whom were already well acquainted with McCain, declined because of prior commitments.[54] The meeting may have served a different purpose, such as consideration of Jindal for the opportunity to speak at the 2008 Republican National Convention, in a similar fashion to Barack Obama at the 2004 Democratic National Convention, cementing a place for him in the party and opening the gate for a future run for the presidency.[55] Speculation was fueled by simultaneous July 21, 2008, reports that McCain was making a sudden visit to Louisiana to confer again with Jindal and that McCain was readying to name his running mate within a week. However, on July 23, 2008, Jindal said that he would not be the Republican vice presidential nominee in 2008.[56] Jindal added that he “never talked to the senator [McCain] about the vice presidency or his thoughts on selecting the vice president.”[56] Ultimately, on August 29, 2008, McCain chose then-Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska as his running mate. While Jindal was given a prime time speech slot at the party convention, he was not offered the keynote speech. During the presidential campaign, Jindal expressed admiration for both Senators McCain and Obama, and maintained that both have made positive contributions to the nation.[57]

Republican response to President Obama’s address to Congress

On February 24, 2009, Jindal delivered the official Republican response to President Obama’s address to a joint session of Congress. Jindal called the president’s economic stimulus plan “irresponsible” and argued against government intervention.[58] He used Hurricane Katrina to warn against government solutions to the economic crisis. “Today in Washington, some are promising that government will rescue us from the economic storms raging all around us,” Jindal said. “Those of us who lived through Hurricane Katrina, we have our doubts.” He praised the late sheriff Harry Lee for standing up to the government during Katrina.[59][60] The speech met with biting reviews from some members of both the Democratic and the Republican parties. Referring to Jindal as “devoid of substantive ideas for governing the country”, political commentator Rachel Maddow summarized Jindal’s Katrina remark as follows: “[Jindal states that] since government failed during Hurricane Katrina, we should understand, not that government should not be allowed to fail again, but that government…never works. That government can’t work, and therefore we should stop seeking a functioning government.”[61] David Johnson, a Republican political strategist criticized Jindal’s mention of Hurricane Katrina, stating “The one thing Republicans want to forget is Katrina.”[62] While Jindal’s speech was poorly received by several Democratic and Republican critics, others argued that the speech should be judged on substance rather than delivery style.[63][64] Some conservative commentators were among his harshest critics, with one calling his speech “a disaster for the Republican Party”. CNN political analyst Candy Crowley said that “Politicians often come back from moments such as these…there is a lot of time left for rehabilitation.”[62][65]

Jindal’s story of meeting Lee in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina was questioned following the speech, as Jindal was not in New Orleans at the time.[66] On February 27, 2009, a spokesman for Jindal clarified the timing of the meeting, stating that the story took place days after the storm.[67] The opportunity to give the response speech to the then very popular President Obama was compared by some commentators to winning “second prize in a beauty contest,” a reference to the board game Monopoly.[68]

Jindal appointments

Governor Jindal appointed both Democrats and Republicans to prominent state posts. He named outgoing Republican State Senator Gerald Theunissen of Jennings to his education transition advisory council.[69] He retained 23 appointees of former governor Kathleen Blanco. One of Jindal’s first high-profile appointments was former Republican State Senator Robert J. Barham of Morehouse Parish as secretary of the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. Another term-limited representative, Joseph F. Toomy of Gretna in Jefferson Parish, was named to the five-member New Orleans Port Authority.

Former Republican State Representative Henry “Tank” Powell of Ponchatoula in Tangipahoa Parish (1996–2008) along with former Democratic Sheriff Leonard “Pop” Hataway of Grant Parish (1976–2008) were appointed to the influential Louisiana Board of Pardons. Democrats Sydnie Mae Durand and Chris Ullo were appointed to the state Pharmacy Board and the Crescent City Connection board, respectively. Jindal also re-appointed Democratic Community and Technical College members Michael Murphy of Bogalusa and Stephen Toups of Baton Rouge.[70] Jindal and Speaker Jim Tucker named the Democrat James R. Fannin of Jonesboro as chairman of the critical House Appropriations Committee.[71]

In January of 2009 Jindal appointed Luling resident Ann Taylor[72] to an at-large position on the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission.

Speculations about political future

Jindal had been mentioned as a potential candidate for the 2012 presidential election. On December 10, 2008, Jindal indicated that he would likely not run for president in 2012, saying he will focus on his re-election in 2011 and that this would make transitioning to a national campaign difficult, though he later attempted to leave himself open to the opportunity to change his mind in the future – he did not rule out a possible 2012 presidential bid.[73] Speculation increased when Republicans chose Jindal to deliver the response to President Obama’s first address to a joint session of Congress.[74]

The Jindal for President Draft Council Inc. PAC has been formed to raise funds for a future presidential run. Jindal states that he has no involvement with the PAC.[75]

In April 2010, while speaking at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference, Jindal ruled out running for President in 2012.[76]

In August 2012, Politico reported that “Bobby Jindal would be considered [for] and would likely take” appointment as United States Secretary of Health and Human Services in a potential Romney cabinet.[77]

Jindal was recently featured in Time‘s magazine article titled “2016: Let’s Get The Party Started” where he was listed as a possible Republican candidate for the 2016 Presidency. The article cited his fiscal and social conservative policies and his Indian American background, which would bring diversity to the GOP.[78]

2011 re-election campaign

See also: Louisiana gubernatorial election, 2011

Jindal ran against four Democrats, a Libertarian and four independents. Jindal received 66% of the vote in the first round, thereby winning election in the first round.[79]

Second term

In August 2011, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) awarded Jindal the Thomas Jefferson Freedom Award for “outstanding public service”[80]

On October 25, 2011, in preparing for his second term, Jindal tapped Republican State Representative Chuck Kleckley of Lake Charles[81] and State Senator John Alario of Westwego as his choices for Speaker of the Louisiana House of Representatives and Louisiana Senate President, respectively. Lawmakers routinely approved the governor’s choices for the two leadership positions. Alario is a long-term Democrat who switched parties prior to the 2011 elections.[82]

Ultimately, only one of the thirty-nine senators, freshman Republican Barrow Peacock of Shreveport, voted against the Alario selection.[83] Jindal had supported Peacock’s intraparty rival for the Senate, term-limited State Representative Jane H. Smith of Bossier City in the general election held on Novembver 19, 2011.[84] The governor subsequently appointed Smith as deputy secretary of the Louisiana Revenue Department.[85]

Upset by education reforms championed by Jindal, a group of teachers has initiated a recall petition.[86][87] The board of directors of the Louisiana Association of Educators unanimously voted to support the recall on June 7, 2012.[88] This is the sixth attempt to recall Jindal. None of the prior petitions received enough signatures to force a recall election.[87]

In 2012, Jindal at first supported his gubernatorial colleague, Rick Perry of Texas. Thereafter, he traveled across the country in support of the Mitt Romney-Paul Ryan ticket. Because Louisiana and other Deep South states voted heavily for the GOP, Jindal could hence devote his campaign time elsewhere. After the defeat of Romney-Ryan, Jindal called for his party to return to “the basics, ,,, If we want people to like us , we have to live them first,” he said on the interview program Fox News Sunday.[89]

As the incoming president of the Republican Governors Association, which will have thirty members in 2013, Jindal questioned Romney for having criticized President Obama as having provided “extraordinary financial gifts from the government”.[89]In reply to Romney, Jindal said, “You don’t start to like people by insulting them and saying their votes were bought.”[89] Jindal said that his party must convince a majority of voters that it supports the middle class and the principle of upward mobility. He also criticized what he termed “stupid” remarks regarding rape and conception made in 2012 by defeated Republican U.S. Senate nominees Todd Akin in Missouri and Richard Mourdock in Indiana.[89]

Positions

Abortion and stem cell research

Jindal has a 100% pro-life voting record according to the National Right to Life Committee.[90] He opposes all abortions without exception, but does not condemn medical procedures aimed at saving the life of the mother that indirectly result in the loss of the unborn child.[91][92][93][94][95] In 2003, Jindal stated that he does not object to the use of emergency contraception in the case of rape if the victim requests it.[92] While in the House of Representatives, he supported two bills to prohibit transporting minors across state lines to obtain an abortion; the bills aimed to prevent doctors and others from helping a minor avoid parental notification laws in their home state by procuring an abortion in another state.[90] He opposes and has voted against expanding public funding of embryonic stem cell research.[90][96]

Same-sex marriage

Jindal opposes the legalization of same-sex marriage. He has voted for the Federal Marriage Amendment to restrict marriage to a union between one man and one woman.[97] In December 2008, Jindal announced the formation of the Louisiana Commission on Marriage and Family,[98]

Government ethics and corruption

He has vetoed state legislation to increase pay for state legislators.[99][100] However, the Louisiana Governor’s office has been ranked last for transparency in the United States both prior to Jindal’s election and since, as reported by the WDSU I-Team. Some legislators attribute the current ranking to legislation removing the governor’s records from the public domain. State Representatives Walker Hines and Neil Abramson say the legislation was surreptitiously inserted as a last-minute amendment into an education bill by Jindal’s office on the last day of the 2008 session, providing no time to properly review it before it passed the legislature and was signed into law by Jindal.[101]

Gun rights

Jindal has stated his support of the Second Amendment‘s right to bear arms. He has opposed efforts to restrict gun rights and has received an endorsement from the National Rifle Association.[102] Jindal earned an A rating from Gun Owners of America[103] while he was in Congress.

As a Congressman, he sponsored Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006 with Sen. Vitter.

Tax policy

As a private citizen, Jindal voted in 2002 for the Louisiana constitutional amendment known as the Stelly Plan[104] which lowered some sales taxes in exchange for higher income taxes. Since taking office, Governor Jindal has cut taxes a total of six times, including the largest income tax cut in Louisiana’s history – a cut of $1.1 billion over five years, along with accelerating the elimination of the tax on business investments.[105] In January 2013, Jindal stated he wants to eliminate all Louisiana corporate and personal income taxes, without giving details for his proposal.[106]

Education

Jindal has proposed budgets that impose cuts on higher education funding in Louisiana, leading to protests from students and education advocates.[107] Jindal has created controversial education reform proposals that have drawn opponents from all party affiliates. Jindal’s proposed education reforms include vouchers for low income students in public schools to attend private schools using Minimum Foundation Program funds.[108] The legislation also includes controversial changes in teacher evaluations, tenure and pensions. Hundreds of teachers, administrators and public education supporters have protested against the legislation at the capital of Louisiana.[109] Teachers opposed to the proposed reforms have canceled classes to attend protests and have begun circulating petitions to recall Jindal and Republican House Speaker Chuck Kleckley.[110] In April 2012, a Louisiana Public Broadcasting program examined possible conflicts between aspects of the Jindal education reform plan and the federal desegregation orders still in place in many parts of Louisiana .[111]

Civil liberties

Gov. Bobby Jindal signs a Five-Star Statement of Support for Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve at Camp Beauregard on October 14. The document signing was an opportunity to join employers from across the country in supporting Soldiers, October 2008

Jindal opposes the Fairness Doctrine on the grounds that it is a violation of the Constitution’s guarantee of free speech and vowed protection of property rights. Jindal voted to extend the PATRIOT Act, voted in favor of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, supported a constitutional amendment banning flag burning,[112] and voted for the Real ID Act of 2005.[113] In the 2009 legislative session, Jindal expressed support for a bill by State Representative James H. “Jim” Morris of Oil City, which would permit motorcyclists to choose whether or not to wear a helmet. Morris’ bill easily passed the House but was blocked in the Senate Health Committee.[114]

Illegal immigration

As a son of immigrants, Jindal has stated that legal immigration brings many benefits to the United States. He has, however, criticized illegal immigration as a drain on the economy, as well as being unfair to those who entered the country by legal means. He has voted to build a fence along the Mexican border and opposes granting amnesty for illegal aliens.[100][115]

Health care

Jindal supports increased health insurance portability, laws promoting coverage of pre-existing medical conditions, a cap on malpractice lawsuits, an easing of restrictions on importation of prescription medications, the implementation of a streamlined electronic medical records system, an emphasis on preventative care rather than emergency room care, and tax benefits aimed at making health insurance more affordable for the uninsured and targeted to promote universal access. Since Governor Jindal has taken office, over 11,000 uninsured children have been added to the State’s Children’s Health Insurance Program. He opposes a federal government-run, single-payer system, but supports state efforts to reduce the uninsured population.[116] He has also supported expanding services for autistic children, and has promoted a national childhood cancer database.[100] In collaboration with Health Secretary Alan Levine, Governor Jindal has drafted the Louisiana Health First Initiative. This plan focuses on expanding health insurance coverage for the state’s indigent population, increasing Medicaid choice, reducing fraud, authorizing funding of a new charity hospital, and increasing transparency in Medicaid by making performance measures available over the internet.[117] Jindal supports co-payments in Medicaid.[118] Due to a congressional reduction in federal Medicaid financing rates, the Jindal administration chose to levy the largest slice of cuts on the network of LSU charity hospitals and clinics, requiring some facilities to close.[119]

Environmental issues and offshore drilling

Governor Bobby Jindal talks to residents of Krotz Springs, LA, during the 2011 flooding of the Mississippi River

Governor Jindal has issued an executive order increasing office recycling programs, reducing solid waste and promoting paperless practices, offering tax credit for hybrid fuel vehicles, increasing average fuel economy goals by 2010, as well as increasing energy efficiency goals and standards for the state.[120] He has stated his opposition to and voted for the criminalization of oil cartels such as OPEC. As a representative in the House, he supported a $300 million bill to fund Louisiana coastal restoration. In addition, he was the chief sponsor of successful legislation to expand the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park by over 3,000 acres (12 km2).[100][121] Jindal has pledged state support for the development of economically friendly cars in northeastern Louisiana in conjunction with alternative energy advocate T. Boone Pickens.[122] Jindal voted to censure a website which promoted the controversial Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository.

Earmarks

In 2007, Jindal led the Louisiana House delegation and ranked 14th among House members in requested earmark funding at nearly $97 million (however in over 99% of these requests, Jindal was a co-sponsor and not the primary initiator of the earmark legislation).[123][124] $5 million of Jindal’s earmark requests were for state defense and indigent healthcare related expenditures, another $50 million was for increasing the safety of Louisiana’s waterways and levees after breaches following Hurricane Katrina, and the remainder was targeted towards coastal restoration and alternative energy research.[125][126] As Governor in 2008, Jindal used his line item veto to strike $16 million in earmarks from the state budget but declined to veto $30 million in legislator-added spending. Jindal vetoed over 250 earmarks in the 2008 state budget, twice the total number of such vetoes by previous governors in the preceding 12 years.[127]

Evolution

Jindal signed a law that permits teachers at public schools to supplement standard evolutionary curricula with analysis and critiques that may include intelligent design.[128] The law forbids “the promotion of any religious doctrine and will not discriminate against religion or non-religion.” Louisiana ACLU Director Marjorie Esman says that if the act is utilized as written, it is on firm constitutional footing, but there is strong potential for abuse,[129] stating that the Act is “susceptible to a constitutional challenge.”[130] Despite calls for a veto from groups such as National Review, and some of Jindal’s genetics professors at Brown University,[131] Jindal signed the Louisiana Academic Freedom Act which passed with a vote of 94–3 in the State House and 35-0 in the State Senate in 2008. As a result of this, the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology rejected New Orleans as a site for their 2010 meeting and the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology will not conduct future meetings in Louisiana.[132][133]

Opposition to Recovery Act

Jindal has been an opponent to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 on the basis that it is not accompanied by revenue increases and that it will further exacerbate the burgeoning national debt. Citing concerns that the augmentation of unemployment insurance may obligate the state to raise taxes on businesses, Jindal had indicated his intention to forgo federal stimulus plan funds ($98 million) aimed at increasing unemployment insurance for Louisiana.[134] Louisiana has since been obligated to raise taxes on businesses because the unemployment trust fund had dropped below the prescribed threshold.[135] Louisiana was set to receive about $3.8 billion overall. Jindal intends to accept at least $2.4 billion from the stimulus package.[136] He called parts of the plan “irresponsible”, saying that “the way to lead is not to raise taxes and put more money and power in hands of Washington politicians.”[137]

Personal life

Jindal was raised in a Hindu household, but he converted to Christianity while in Baton Rouge Magnet High School. During his first year at Brown University, he was received into the Catholic Church. His family attends weekly Mass at Saint Aloysius Parish in Baton Rouge.[32]

Bobby and Supriya Jolly Jindal meet with then-President George W. Bush.

Jindal’s father, Amar Jindal, received a Bachelor of Science degree in civil engineering from Guru Nanak Dev University.[138][139] Jindal’s mother, Raj (Pal) Jindal,[138] is an information technology director for the Louisiana Workforce Commission (formerly the Louisiana Department of Labor) and served as Assistant Secretary to former State Labor Secretary Garey Forster during the administration of Governor Murphy J. “Mike” Foster, Jr.[140] Prior to immigrating to the United States, both his parents were lecturers at an Indian engineering college.[141] According to Jindal, his mother was already four months pregnant with him when they arrived from India.[142] Jindal has a younger brother, Nikesh, who is a registered Republican and supported his brother’s campaign for Governor.[143][144] Nikesh went to Dartmouth College, where he graduated with honors, and then Yale Law School. Nikesh is now a lawyer in Washington, D.C.[139]

Jindal’s nickname dates to his childhood identification with a sitcom character. He has said, “Every day after school, I’d come home and I’d watch The Brady Bunch. And I identified with Bobby, you know? He was about my age, and ‘Bobby’ stuck.”[145] He has been known by his nickname ever since, though his legal name remains Piyush Jindal.[146]

In 1997, Jindal married Supriya Jolly who was born in New Delhi, India and moved to Baton Rouge with her parents when she was four years old.[147] They attended the same high school, but Supriya’s family moved from Baton Rouge to New Orleans after her freshman year and they did not begin dating until later, when Jindal invited her to a Mardi Gras party after another friend had canceled. Supriya Jindal earned a bachelor’s degree in chemical engineering and an M.B.A. degree from Tulane University.[148] She is working on a PhD in marketing at Louisiana State University.[149] She created The Supriya Jindal Foundation for Louisiana’s Children, a non-profit organization aimed at improving math and science education in grade schools.[150] They have three children: Selia Elizabeth, Shaan Robert, and Slade Ryan. Shaan was born with a congenital heart defect and had surgery as an infant. The Jindals have been outspoken advocates for children with congenital defects, particularly those without insurance. In 2006, Jindal and his wife delivered their third child at home. Barely able to call 911 before the delivery, Jindal received medical coaching by phone to deliver their eight-pound, 2.5-ounce boy.[151]

Writings

A list of Jindal’s published writings up to 2001 can be found in the hearing report for his 2001 U.S. Senate confirmation.[152] They include newspaper columns, law review articles, and first authorships in several scientific and policy articles that have appeared in the prominent Journal of the American Medical Association, Journal of the Louisiana State Medical Association, and Hospital Outlook.[153]

Jindal’s pre-2001 writings include several articles in the New Oxford Review, one of which later made news during his 2003 gubernatorial race.[154] In that 1994 article titled “Physical Dimensions of Spiritual Warfare”, Jindal described the events leading up to an apparent exorcism of a friend and how he felt unable to help her at the time. However, Jindal questioned whether what he saw was actually an example of “spiritual warfare”.[155]

In November 2010, Jindal published the book Leadership and Crisis, a semi-autobiography significantly influenced by the Governor’s experiences with the most recent Gulf Oil Spill.

Electoral history

Governor of Louisiana, 2003
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, October 4, 2003
Candidate Affiliation Support Outcome
Bobby Jindal Republican 443,389 (33%) Runoff
Kathleen Blanco Democratic 250,136 (18%) Runoff
Richard Ieyoub Democratic 223,513 (16%) Defeated
Claude “Buddy” Leach Democratic 187,872 (14%) Defeated
Others n.a. 257,614 (19%) Defeated
Second Ballot, November 15, 2003
Candidate Affiliation Support Outcome
Kathleen Blanco Democratic 731,358 (52%) Elected
Bobby Jindal Republican 676,484 (48%) Defeated
U.S. Representative, 1st Congressional District, 2004
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 2, 2004
Candidate Affiliation Support Outcome
Bobby Jindal Republican 225,708 (78%) Elected
Roy Armstrong Democratic 19,266 (7%) Defeated
Others n.a. 42,923 (15%) Defeated
U.S. Representative, 1st Congressional District, 2006
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, November 7, 2006
Candidate Affiliation Support Outcome
Bobby Jindal Republican 130,508 (88%) Elected
David Gereighty Democratic 10,919 (7%) Defeated
Others n.a. 6,701 (5%) Defeated
Governor of Louisiana, 2007
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, October 20, 2007
Candidate Affiliation Support Outcome
Bobby Jindal Republican 699,672 (54%) Elected
Walter Boasso Democratic 226,364 (17%) Defeated
John Georges Independent 186,800 (14%) Defeated
Foster Campbell Democratic 161,425 (12%) Defeated
Others n.a. 23,682 (3%) Defeated
Governor of Louisiana, 2011
Threshold > 50%
First Ballot, October 22, 2011
Candidate Affiliation Support Outcome
Bobby Jindal Republican 672,950 (66%) Elected
Tara Hollis Democratic 182,755 (18%) Defeated
Cary J. Deaton Democratic 49,988 (5%) Defeated
Ivo “Trey” Roberts Democratic 33,194 (3%) Defeated

References

  1. ^ Jonathan Tilove (May 6, 2011). “Gov. Bobby Jindal releases his birth certificate”. New Orleans Times-Picayune.
  2. ^ Michelle Millhollon, “Jindal apparent winner *** Main foes concede election,” The Advocate (Baton Rouge, La.), October 21, 2007
  3. ^ Nossiter, Adam (October 22, 2007). “In a Southern U.S. state, immigrants’ son takes over”. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved October 14, 2008.
  4. ^ a b c d Sager, Mike (February 24, 2009), “Bobby Jindal, All American”, Esquire
  5. ^ “Governor Bobby Jindal” BobbyJindal.com, Retrieved November 27, 2010.
  6. ^ a b Konieczko, Jill (May 22, 2008). “10 Things You Didn’t Know About Bobby Jindal”. U.S. News & World Report.
  7. ^ Gov. Bobby Jindal (R)
  8. ^ Miller, John J. (May 14, 2007). “The Louisiana wunderkind: beholding Rep. Bobby Jindal” (republished onFindArticles). National Review. Archived from the original on January 5, 2008.
  9. ^ http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AD&p_theme=ad&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB47801EBF0A17C&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM
  10. ^ “Bobby Jindal”. New York Times. Retrieved July 23, 2012.
  11. ^ Rush Limbaugh defends Bobby Jindal – Congressman Bobby Jindal – Zimbio[dead link]
  12. ^ Hasten, Mike (September 19, 2007). “Governor’s race becomes a labor vs. business battle”. The Town Talk (Alexandria, LA).
  13. ^ “Governor Bobby Jindal | State of Louisiana”. Gov.state.la.us. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  14. ^ “Bobby Jindal Biography – Who Is Republican Governor Bobby Jindal?”. Esquire. February 24, 2009. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  15. ^ Biography of Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation at the Wayback Machine, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, c. 2001. Retrieved October 25, 2007.
  16. ^ “Bobby’s Experience”. About Bobby. bobbyjindal.com. 2008.
  17. ^ “Bobby Jindal announces he is stepping down as HHS Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation” (Press release). United States Department of Health and Human Services. February 13, 2003. Retrieved October 25, 2007.
  18. ^ http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=hRtOAAAAIBAJ&sjid=euwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=4994,6382114&dq=bobby+jindal&hl=en
  19. ^ Moller, Jan (August 16, 2007). “Jindal counters Demo attacks; Rapid response to ads reflects shift in tactics”. The Times-Picayune (New Orleans, LA).
  20. ^ “News Features”. Catholic Culture. August 22, 2007. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  21. ^ 3-general-election/ “Two Louisiana Congressional Districts Primed for May 3 General Election”. Fox News. Associated Press. April 6, 2008. Retrieved October 18, 2008. “In the 1st Congressional District….the staunchly conservative district….”
  22. ^ Gerard Shields, “New La. congressmen catching up fast”, The Advocate (Baton Rouge, La.), December 19, 2004. The first Indian-American elected to Congress was Dalip Singh Saund, a California Democrat, serving from 1957 to 1963.
  23. ^ http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AD&p_theme=ad&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=10975FCE31AFBCAC&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM
  24. ^ “NewsLibrary.com – newspaper archive, clipping service – newspapers and other news sources”. Nl.newsbank.com. February 22, 2006. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  25. ^ http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=AD&p_theme=ad&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=108245AFC09C9165&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM
  26. ^ Young, Jeffrey (May 31, 2005). “Congress, governors look for Medicaid reforms of their own – The Hill – covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill”. TheHill.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  27. ^ “Curry: Bush charts course, with rocks ahead – politics – Tom Curry – NBCNews.com”. MSNBC. February 3, 2005. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  28. ^ [1][dead link]
  29. ^ Moller, Jan (January 23, 2007). “Jindal quietly begins his run”. The Times-Picayune (New Orleans, LA).
  30. ^ “Official Election Results for Election Date: 10/20/07″. Louisiana Secretary of State.
  31. ^ Governor Bobby Jindal
  32. ^ a b Whoriskey, Peter (October 21, 2007). “Jindal Wins Louisiana Race, Becomes First Indian American Governor”. The Washington Post: p. A8. Retrieved October 21, 2007.
  33. ^ Jan Moller (October 21, 2007). “1st Indian-American governor in U.S. vows ‘fresh start’ for La”. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  34. ^ Zhao, Xiaojian (2009). Asian American chronology: chronologies of the American mosaic. ABC-CLIO. p. 147. ISBN 9780313348754. Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  35. ^ [2][dead link]
  36. ^ “Election 2008: Louisiana Senate”. Rasmussen Reports. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  37. ^ “Text of Gov. Jindal Inauguration speech (includes video)”. WWL-TV. New Orleans, LA. January 14, 2008.
  38. ^ “Official Election Results for Election Date: 5/03/08″. Louisiana Secretary of State.
  39. ^ Scott, Robert Travis (June 27, 2008). “Recall petition filed against JindalRecall petition filed against Jindal”. The Times-Picayune. “Ryan and Kourtney Fournier of Jefferson submitted paperwork to the Secretary of State’s office that allows them to attempt to collect the nearly 1 million signatures needed over the next 180 days to force a recall election of the governor… He had pledged during his campaign last year to prohibit an immediate legislative pay raise.”
  40. ^ “Jindal Action Plan” (PDF). available from WJBO-AM.
  41. ^ “Gov. Jindal’s veto refusal contradicts candidate Jindal’s campaign pledge”. The Daily Advertiser. June 18, 2008. “‘I am very sorry to see the Legislature do this,’ he said. ‘More than doubling legislative pay is not reasonable and the public has been clear on that… I will keep my pledge to let [the legislature] govern themselves and make their own decisions as a separate branch of government. I will not let anything, even this clearly excessive pay raise, stop us from moving forward with a clear plan of reform.’”
  42. ^ Anderson, Ed (June 30, 2008). “Jindal vetoes legislative raise”. The Times-Picayune. “Gov. Bobby Jindal announced today that he has vetoed the legislative pay raise. After days of saying he would not reject the unpopular measure, Jindal said this morning that he had changed his mind. ‘I thank the people for their voice and their attention,’ Jindal said of the public outcry against the raise. ‘I am going to need your help to move this state forward. … The voters have demanded change… I made a mistake by staying out if it’.”
  43. ^ “News | State’s bond rating upgraded again – Baton Rouge, LA”. 2theadvocate.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  44. ^ “Obama, live from New Orleans”. USA Today. October 15, 2009. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
  45. ^ “Jim Beam, Jindal Becomes Mileage Champion. Lake Charles American Press, January 11, 2009. Retrieved January 23, 2009.
  46. ^ [3][dead link]
  47. ^ http://bestofneworleans.com/gyrobase/PrintFriendly?oid=oid%3A53436
  48. ^ Highest Ranking – EVER (July 30, 2012). “Governor Bobby Jindal”. Bobbyjindal.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  49. ^ “Jindal and Nagin praised for response to Gustav”. Associated Press. Newsday.com. September 4, 2008.
  50. ^ “Bobby Jindal’s hurricane handling comes in for more praise – news”. Siliconindia.com. September 10, 2008. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  51. ^ Tanner, Robert (September 3, 2008). “Gustav political report card: Jindal, Nagin lauded”. Associated Press. Cleveland.com.
  52. ^ Whoriskey, Peter (September 3, 2008). “Jindal Presents A Face of Calm During the Storm; La. Governor Hailed for Recovery Efforts”. Washington Post: p. A06.
  53. ^ Curl, Joseph (February 12, 2008). “Running mate guessing game begins”. Washington Times. Retrieved March 3, 2008.
  54. ^ Nagourney, Adam (May 21, 2008). “McCain to Meet 3 Possible Running Mates”. New York Times. Retrieved May 21, 2008.
  55. ^ Dvorak, Blake (May 22, 2008). “What About Jindal?”. Real Clear Politics. Retrieved May 22, 2008.
  56. ^ a b “Jindal Says He’s Not Interested in No. 2 Spot With McCain”. ‘Fox News. July 23, 2008. Retrieved July 23, 2008.
  57. ^ “Bobby Jindal: Obama ‘greatest’ speaker: The Swamp”. Swamppolitics.com. March 3, 2009. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  58. ^ Bacon, Perry, Jr. (February 25, 2009). “In GOP Response, Jindal Blasts Stimulus”. Washington Post: p. A08. Retrieved February 25, 2009.
  59. ^ “Transcript – The Republican Response by Gov. Bobby Jindal”. The New York Times. February 24, 2009. Retrieved February 25, 2009.
  60. ^ “Gov. Bobby Jindal’s volcano remark has some fuming”. CNN. February 25, 2009. Retrieved February 25, 2009.
  61. ^ The Rachel Maddow Show on msnbc.com. “Rachel Re:Sponse”.
  62. ^ a b Fouhy, Beth (February 25, 2009). “Republicans, Democrats criticize Jindal’s speech”. Associated Press. Retrieved February 26, 2009.[dead link]
  63. ^ Przybyla, Heidi (February 25, 2009). “Jindal’s Response to Obama Address Panned by Fellow Republicans”. Bloomberg L.P.. Retrieved February 25, 2009.
  64. ^ Mooney, Alexander (February 25, 2009). “Jindal earns bad reviews in national debut”. CNN. Retrieved February 25, 2009.
  65. ^ “Jindal earns bad reviews in national debut – CNN.com”. CNN. February 26, 2009. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
  66. ^ Montopoli, Brian (February 27, 2009). “Was Jindal’s Katrina Story Accurate?”. CBS News.
  67. ^ Smith, Ben (February 27, 2009). “Jindal aides clarify Katrina story – Ben Smith”. Politico.Com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  68. ^ One night only Barack Obama vs. Bobby Jindal, Christian Science Monitor, February 11, 2009
  69. ^ “Bobby Jindal Selects Education Transition Team”. bayoubuzz.com. Retrieved October 31, 2009.
  70. ^ “Politics | Jindal sends Senate list of appointees – Baton Rouge, LA”. 2theadvocate.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  71. ^ “Tom Kelly, “Fannin to chair House Appropriations: New administration takes office as ‘mirror image’ from 80 years ago”". thepineywoods.com. Retrieved November 9, 2009.
  72. ^ Taylor, Ann. “Governor appoints Ann Taylor to Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission”. Louisiana Sportsman Magazine. Retrieved 7 November 2012.
  73. ^ Ben Smith. “Jindal says no”. Politico.com. Retrieved December 10, 2008.
  74. ^ Baltimore, Chris (February 19, 2009). “Republicans tap Louisiana governor for big speech”. Reuters.
  75. ^ “Jindal PAC Formed for Presidential Run”. June 15, 2009.
  76. ^ “For GOP, no frontrunner and no worries”. Politico. April 11, 2010.
  77. ^ “Who’s on the inside track for a Romney Cabinet” by MIKE ALLEN and JIM VANDEHEI, Politico, August 28, 2012, Retrieved 2012-08-28
  78. ^ “2016: Let’s Get The Party Started”, Time: 118-131, November 19, 2012
  79. ^ “Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal Re-Elected in a Landslide”. Fox News. AP. October 22, 2011.
  80. ^ “First it was corporations bailing out; now the parade of Louisiana Legislators exiting ALEC membership begins « Louisiana Voice”. Louisianavoice.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  81. ^ “Jindal to support Kleckley in speaker race”. wwl.com. Retrieved October 26, 2011.
  82. ^ “Ed Anderson, “Gov. Bobby Jindal endorses Sen. John Alario as his choice for Senate president”, October 25, 2011″. nola.com. Retrieved October 26, 2011.
  83. ^ “John Maginnis, “Standing Up to Jindal”, January 23, 2012″. businessreport.com. Retrieved January 31, 2012.
  84. ^ “4th time is the charm – Peacock defeats Jindal-backed candidate for Senate seat”. politicsla.com. Retrieved January 31, 2012.
  85. ^ “Smith takes Jindal Administration role, January 11, 2011″. Bossier Press-Tribune. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  86. ^ “Teachers target Jindal, lawmakers with recalls”. The Times-Picayune. Associated Press (New Orleans). June 22, 2012. Retrieved July 1, 2012.
  87. ^ a b “Recall effort launched over public education revamp”. The Advocate (Baton Rouge). March 29, 2012. Retrieved July 1, 2012.
  88. ^ Hasten, Mike (June 9, 2012). “LAE joins Jindal recall effort”. The News-Star (Monroe, LA). Retrieved July 1, 2012.
  89. ^ a b c d “Governor: Liking people key to enlarging GOP base”, Laredo Morning Times, November 19, 2012, p. 6A
  90. ^ a b c “Bobby Jindal on Abortion”. On the Issues. September 16, 2008.
  91. ^ Sentell, Will and Dyer, Scott (November 11, 2003). “Abortion flier offends Jindal”. The Advocate (Baton Rouge, LA). “He said he does not condemn medical procedures aimed at saving the life of the mother that result indirectly in the loss of the unborn child as a secondary effect.”
  92. ^ a b John Hill (November 12, 2003). “Gubernatorial candidates to meet today in final TV debate”. Capitol Watch: Your Guide to Louisiana State Government.
  93. ^ Walls, Seth Colter, “Who Is Bobby Jindal? The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly”, The Huffington Post, May 30, 2008
  94. ^ GOP Looks to Louisiana’s Governor”, The Washington Post, November 30, 2008
  95. ^ Romano, Andrew, “Their Own Obama”, Newsweek, December 22, 2008
  96. ^ Alpert, Bruce and Jan Moller (May 21, 2008). “Jindal to meet Friday with McCain”. The Times-Picayune. “Jindal is seen as solid on conservative social issues such as opposition to abortion and embryonic stem cell research.”
  97. ^ “Bobby Jindal on Civil Rights”. OntheIssues.org.
  98. ^ Louisiana Gov. Jindal picks Louisiana Commission on Marriage and Family on BayouBuzz.com.
  99. ^ Tim Morris, The Times-Picayune. “Jindal vetoes legislative raise”. NOLA.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  100. ^ a b c d “Bobby Jindal on the Issues”. Ontheissues.org. March 14, 2012. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  101. ^ “I-Team: Governor’s Office Ranks Last In Transparency – New Orleans News Story – WDSU New Orleans”. Wdsu.com. July 9, 2008. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  102. ^ Comment Cancel. “Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal Speaks at the NRA Annual Meetings”. Mixx. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  103. ^ “GOA House Ratings for the 109th Congress”. GunOwners.org. October 2006. Archived from the original on January 22, 2008.
  104. ^ Tidmore, Christopher (May 24, 2004). “The Weekly’s inside political track….”. Louisiana Weekly. Archived from the original on October 17, 2006.
  105. ^ Moses, Caroline (June 18, 2008). “Stelly tax ad causing controversy”. Baton Rouge, LA: WAFB Channel 9.
  106. ^ Kathy Finn (10 January 2013). “Louisiana Governor Jindal proposes ending state income tax”. Reuters. Retrieved 12 January 2013.
  107. ^ “Hundreds rally against higher education cuts”. The Advocate (Baton Rouge, LA).
  108. ^ Ted Jackson, The Times-Picayune. “Bobby Jindal education bills whisk through Louisiana Senate panel”. NOLA.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  109. ^ By msnbc.com. “Teacher protest closes schools in Louisiana – U.S. News”. Usnews.msnbc.msn.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  110. ^ Wolfgang, Ben (April 3, 2012). “Some Louisiana teachers look to expel governor”. The Washington Times.
  111. ^ “School Choice and Desegregation”. Louisiana Public Broadcasting.
  112. ^ “Final Vote Results for Roll Call 296″. U.S. House of Representatives. June 22, 2005. “H J RES 10     2/3 YEA-AND-NAY …..QUESTION: On Passage …BILL TITLE: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.”
  113. ^ “Key Votes: HR 418: Real ID Act of 2005 (Immigration)”. VoteSmart.org. 02/10/2005. |>
  114. ^ “Senate Panel Rejects Cycle Helmet Repeal”. Natchez Democrat, Natchez, Mississippi. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
  115. ^ “The Republican Response by Gov. Bobby Jindal”. The New York Times. February 24, 2009. Retrieved April 26, 2010.
  116. ^ “Governor Bobby Jindal Discusses Health Care Reform He Wants to See”. Fox News. September 29, 2009.
  117. ^ “Louisiana Health First – Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals”. Dhh.louisiana.gov. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  118. ^ Bobby Jindal 2004 Congressional Campaign Website
  119. ^ “LSU health care system takes brunt of Medicaid cut”. WWTV. Associated Press. July 13, 2012. Retrieved July 18, 2012. “LSU’s network of charity hospitals and clinics will lose a quarter of its budget, with the Jindal administration choosing to levy the largest slice of Medicaid cuts on the facilities. Health and Hospitals Secretary Bruce Greenstein said nearly $317 million of the $523 million in cuts announced Friday will fall on the public health care system run by LSU. Hospital officials had previously warned that they couldn’t make deep cuts without shuttering facilities. Greenstein said the administration’s plan doesn’t call for closures, but asks LSU to make structural changes and create efficiencies. The slashing is tied to a congressional reduction in Louisiana’s federal Medicaid financing rate. Other cuts will fall on hospitals that take care of Medicaid patients. A state-run mental hospital in Mandeville will be closed.”
  120. ^ “Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal Announces Executive Order on Environmentally Friendly Government | All American Patriots: Politics, economy, health, environment, energy and te”. All American Patriots. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  121. ^ “House Committee Unanimously Approves Rep. Jindal Legislation To Expand Jean Lafitte Barataria Preserve – Us Fed News Service, Including Us State News | Highbeam Research – Fre”. Highbeam.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  122. ^ Michelle Krebs (June 17, 2009). “Miata Designer Matano, T. Boone Pickens Part of Start-Up Car Company”. Auto Observer. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  123. ^ Bobby Jindal’s secret love affair with earmarks added up to more than $97 million in FY ’08 | BuzzFlash.org[dead link]
  124. ^ “Total Earmarks in FY08 Appropriations Bills, by Earmarks Received” (MS Excel). Taxpayers for Common Sense.
  125. ^ “Bobby Jindal: Campaign Finance/Money – Other Data – Earmarks 2008″. OpenSecrets. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  126. ^ “Bobby Jindal – House Defense Appropriations, FY2008″. EarmarkWatch.org. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  127. ^ Moller, Jan (July 15, 2008). “Jindal hacks budget earmarks”. The Times-Picayune.
  128. ^ McCulley, Russell (October 4, 2007). “The Second Coming of Bobby Jindal”. Time Magazine.
  129. ^ “The evidence at trial demonstrates that ID is nothing less than the progeny of creationism” (page 31) in “Judgement” of Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
  130. ^ Esman, Marjorie. 2009. “ACLU Comments on Bulletin 741, § 2304″ June 8, 2009 letter.
  131. ^ Barrow, Bill (June 26, 2008). “Science law could set tone for Jindal”. The Times-Picayune.
  132. ^ Satterlie, Robert (February 5, 2009). “Letter to Bobby Jindal” (PDF). Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  133. ^ Gill, James (February 18, 2009). “Mad scientists”. Times-Picayune. Retrieved February 27, 2009.
  134. ^ “Jindal to Turn Down Stimulus $$$ for Jobless”. Newser.com. February 20, 2009.
  135. ^ “Unemployment taxes to rise, benefits shrink in 2010″. nola.com. September 23, 2009.
  136. ^ “Jindal to use $2.4 billion from stimulus package”. WWL-TV. March 2009.
  137. ^ [4] Ben Pershing, “Obama Emphasizes Reform, Offers Hope Amid Economic Crisis.” The Washington Post, February 24, 2009. Retrieved July 14, 2009.
  138. ^ a b “The Tribune, Chandigarh, India – Punjab”. Tribuneindia.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  139. ^ a b “Bobby Jindal Biography – Who Is Republican Governor Bobby Jindal?”. Esquire. February 24, 2009. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  140. ^ Millhollon, Michelle (March 19, 2008). “Jindal’s mother still with state”. The Advocate (Baton Rouge, LA: 2theadvocate.com): p. 10A.
  141. ^ “Bobby Jindal Biography – Who Is Republican Governor Bobby Jindal?”. Esquire. February 24, 2009. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  142. ^ “Bobby Jindal on Principles & Values”, On the Issues. Retrieved June 25, 2010.
  143. ^ “Bobby Jindal”. Nndb.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  144. ^ “Nikesh Jindal – $4,000 in Political Contributions for 2004″. Campaignmoney.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  145. ^ “Bobby Jindal: The GOP’s Rising Star?”. 60 Minutes (CBS News). March 1, 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2009.
  146. ^ Haniffa, Ariz (November 16, 2003). “He is Piyush, not Bobby”. India Abroad (Baton Rouge, LA).
  147. ^ Weiner, Rachel (March 24, 2009). “Meghan McCain Interviews Supriya Jindal, First Lady of Louisiana”. Huffington Post.
  148. ^ “Suddenly Supriya: Louisiana’s new first lady is mom and MBA”. Nola.com. January 13, 2008. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  149. ^ “Mom Congress Advisor: Supriya Jindal”. Parenting.com. January 14, 2008. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  150. ^ “Jindal Foundation home page”. Jindalfoundation.org. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  151. ^ Konieczko, Jill (May 22, 2008). “”10 Things You Didn’t Know About Bobby Jindal”. ”US News and World Report””. Usnews.com. Retrieved 2012-08-07.
  152. ^ “Nominatons of Claude Allen, Thomas Scully, Piyush Jindal, Linnet F. Deily, Peter Allgeier, Peter R. Fisher, and James Gurule”, U.S. Senate Hearing 107–130, 107th Congress, 1st Session, May 16, 2001, pp. 95–97. Retrieved November 27, 2010.
  153. ^ PubMed.gov, U.S. National Library of Medicine
  154. ^ Goddard, Taegan (November 7, 2003). “Jindal and Satan”. Political Wire. Retrieved June 12, 2008.
  155. ^ Jindal, Bobby (December 1994). “Beating A Demon: Physical Dimensions of Spiritual Warfare”. New Oxford Review. Retrieved May 12, 2010. “I began to think that the demon would only attack me if I tried to pray or fight back….Did I witness spiritual warfare? I do not have the answers…”

External links

Portal icon Louisiana portal
Portal icon Biography portal
Portal icon Politics portal
Find more about Bobby Jindal at Wikipedia’s sister projects
Definitions and translations from Wiktionary
Media from Commons
Learning resources from Wikiversity
News stories from Wikinews
Quotations from Wikiquote
Source texts from Wikisource
Textbooks from Wikibooks
Governor
Congress
United States House of Representatives
Preceded by
David Vitter
Member of the House of Representatives
from Louisiana’s 1st congressional district

2005–2008
Succeeded by
Steve Scalise
Political offices
Preceded by
Kathleen Blanco
Governor of Louisiana
2008–present
Incumbent
United States order of precedence
Preceded by
Joe Biden
as Vice President
Order of Precedence of the United States
Within Louisiana
Succeeded by
Mayor of city
in which event is held
Succeeded by
Otherwise John Boehner
as Speaker of the House of Representatives
Preceded by
John Kasich
as Governor of Ohio
Order of Precedence of the United States
Outside Louisiana
Succeeded by
Mike Pence
as Governor of Indiana
[show]

[show]

[show]

Current elected statewide political officials of Louisiana
[show]

Authority control
  1. 10 personal results. 4,620,000 other results.
    Bobby Jindal
    Piyush “Bobby” Jindal is an American politician and the 55th and current Governor of Louisiana. Born in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to immigrants from India, Jindal studied biology and public policy at Brown University from 1988 to 1991. Wikipedia
    Feedback / More info

    Bobby Jindal: Conservative Messiah and I « elcidharth

    elcidharth.com/…/bobby-jindal-conservative-messiah-and-i/

    Nov 15, 2012 – cogito ergo sum I Think, Therefore I am Home Archives Profile Subscribe « Cool it, Foreign Policy Wonks | Main 11/15/2012 Of Conservative

  2. Conservative Trojan Horse, John McCain and I « elcidharth

    elcidharth.com/…/conservative-trojan-horse-john-mccain-and-…

    Nov 19, 2012 – Confounding Conservatives, Cons and I « elcidharth Nov 13, 2012 – Of Conservative Cadaver, Bobby Jindal and I ….. Review, Conservative

  3. Forbes « elcidharth

    elcidharth.com/tag/forbes/

    Dec 13, 2012 – Posts about Forbes written by elcidharth. Bobby Jindal, who not only look different than the Republican stereotype (Rubio is Latino, Jindal is

  4. Fight or Flight Nobody’s Right VOTE!@elcidharth.com | My Sister

    mysistereileen.org/…/fight-or-flight-nobodys-right-voteelcidha

    Nov 5, 2012 – elcidharth.com: reply. linkicon reporticon emailicon … …… Nikki Haley, and Bobby Jindal are taken into account—but the gap remains wide.

    …and I am Sid Harth@elcidharth.comphoto1